Hajara vs Puthampurayil Abdul Raheem Advocate - K.M. Ramdas — 300091/2023
Case under Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (Kerala) Section U/S11(3). Status: For Steps. Next hearing: 31st March 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLKK300004752023
Next Hearing
31st March 2026
e-Filing Number
07-10-2023
Filing Number
478/2023
Filing Date
11-10-2023
Registration No
300091/2023
Registration Date
13-10-2023
Court
Munsiff Court, Vadakara
Judge
1-Munsiff
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hajara
Adv. ANIL RAJ K K
Shuibe
Adv. ANIL RAJ K K
Respondent(s)
Puthampurayil Abdul Raheem Advocate - K.M. Ramdas
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff
For Steps
Judge on leave / duty
For Steps
For Steps
Report on mediation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | For Steps |
| 27-02-2026 | Judge on leave / duty |
| 07-02-2026 | For Steps |
| 03-01-2026 | For Steps |
| 02-12-2025 | Report on mediation |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary All four rent control petitions (RCP 90/2023, 91/2023, 92/2023, and 94/2023) have been allowed with costs. The Rent Controller/Munsiff of Vatakara issued eviction orders under Sections 11(3) and 11(4)(i) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, directing the respondents to vacate the commercial shop rooms (bearing door nos. 18/14, 18/15, 18/16, and 18/17) and hand them over to the petitioners within one month. The court found that the petitioners (legal heirs of the deceased original owner) have established genuine bonafide need for the premises to commence a household utensil and agricultural tools business, and in one case, confirmed unauthorized subletting by the tenant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary All four rent control petitions (RCP 90/2023, 91/2023, 92/2023, and 94/2023) have been allowed with costs. The Rent Controller/Munsiff of Vatakara issued eviction orders under Sections 11(3) and 11(4)(i) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, directing the respondents to vacate the commercial shop rooms (bearing door nos. 18/14, 18/15, 18/16, and 18/17) and hand them over to the petitioners within one month. The court found that the petitioners (legal heirs of the deceased original owner) have established genuine bonafide need for the premises to commence a household utensil and agricultural tools business, and in one case, confirmed unauthorized subletting by the tenant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts