Hajara vs Ambalathumkandi Rajeeb Advocate - C. Subramanyian, P.Anoop and Amaya.V — 300090/2023
Case under --- Section U/S 11 (3). Status: For Steps. Next hearing: 31st March 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLKK300004652023
Next Hearing
31st March 2026
e-Filing Number
07-10-2023
Filing Number
468/2023
Filing Date
07-10-2023
Registration No
300090/2023
Registration Date
09-10-2023
Court
Munsiff Court, Vadakara
Judge
1-Munsiff
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hajara
Adv. ANIL RAJ K K
Shuibe
Adv. ANIL RAJ K K
Hajara
Adv. ANIL RAJ K K
Shuibe
Adv. ANIL RAJ K K
Respondent(s)
Ambalathumkandi Rajeeb Advocate - C. Subramanyian, P.Anoop and Amaya.V
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff
For Steps
Judge on leave / duty
For Steps
For Steps
Report on mediation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | For Steps |
| 27-02-2026 | Judge on leave / duty |
| 07-02-2026 | For Steps |
| 03-01-2026 | For Steps |
| 02-12-2025 | Report on mediation |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary All four rent control petitions (RCP 90/23, 91/23, 92/23, 94/23) were ALLOWED. The Rent Controller ordered eviction of the respondents from commercial shop rooms bearing Door Nos. 18/14, 18/15, 18/16, and 18/17 in Azhiyur, Vatakara, directing them to vacate and hand over possession to the petitioners within one month. The petitioners were also awarded costs, having established bonafide need to commence a household utensil and agricultural tools business and, in one case, unauthorized subletting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary All four rent control petitions (RCP 90/23, 91/23, 92/23, 94/23) were ALLOWED. The Rent Controller ordered eviction of the respondents from commercial shop rooms bearing Door Nos. 18/14, 18/15, 18/16, and 18/17 in Azhiyur, Vatakara, directing them to vacate and hand over possession to the petitioners within one month. The petitioners were also awarded costs, having established bonafide need to commence a household utensil and agricultural tools business and, in one case, unauthorized subletting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts