A K Chandran vs M P Padmini — 300150/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S26 O7 R1. Status: Judge on leave / duty. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKK300004622017
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
343/2017
Filing Date
04-10-2017
Registration No
300150/2017
Registration Date
06-10-2017
Court
Munsiff Court, Vadakara
Judge
1-Munsiff
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A K Chandran
Adv. K P Dinesan
Uthakapoyil kuniyil Kamala
Adv. K P Dinesan
Respondent(s)
M P Padmini
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff
Judge on leave / duty
For Carry Out Amendment
For hearing on IA
For Counter
For Counter in IA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-05-2026 | Judge on leave / duty |
| 23-03-2026 | For Carry Out Amendment |
| 16-03-2026 | For hearing on IA |
| 24-02-2026 | For Counter |
| 16-02-2026 | For Counter in IA |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 300150/2017 The Munsiff Court, Vatakara decreed the suit in favor of plaintiffs A.K. Chandran and Uthakapoyil Kuniyil Kamala against defendant M.P. Padmini. The court ordered the defendant to demolish and remove illegal structures (shed, flag pole, iron ladder, latrine) erected on the plaintiffs' properties without consent, evict encroached land, and demolish a building constructed without proper setback distance violating Panchayat rules. The defendant was also permanently restrained from further construction without permits. The counter-claim was dismissed and the suit was decreed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 300150/2017 The Munsiff Court, Vatakara decreed the suit in favor of plaintiffs A.K. Chandran and Uthakapoyil Kuniyil Kamala against defendant M.P. Padmini. The court ordered the defendant to demolish and remove illegal structures (shed, flag pole, iron ladder, latrine) erected on the plaintiffs' properties without consent, evict encroached land, and demolish a building constructed without proper setback distance violating Panchayat rules. The defendant was also permanently restrained from further construction without permits. The counter-claim was dismissed and the suit was decreed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts