Smera K vs Brinda Ramesh — 300088/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 7 1. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 19th March 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKK300002692025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

17-07-2025

Filing Number

279/2025

Filing Date

19-07-2025

Registration No

300088/2025

Registration Date

19-07-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Vadakara

Judge

1-Munsiff

Decision Date

19th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 7 1
Ia/2/2025 Classification : Petition Section Smera KBrinda Ramesh
Ia/3/2025 Classification : Application to Recall Witness Section Smera KBrinda Ramesh

Petitioner(s)

Smera K

Adv. KRISHNAN B

Raji Raghunath

Adv. KRISHNAN B

Respondent(s)

Brinda Ramesh

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff

19-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

FOR HEARING

28-02-2026

Written Statement

27-02-2026

Judge on leave / duty

23-02-2026

Order/ Judgement

Final Orders / Judgements

19-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: 300088/2025 The Munsiff Court of Vatakara declared that Raghunath is the sole legal heir of Padmanabhan (under Hindu Succession Act Section 15(2)(b), as the property inherited by Padmanabhan's widow Jayalakshmi devolved to him as her husband's heir), and the plaintiffs (Raghunath's wife and daughter) are his legal heirs. The court allowed the declaration suit based on documentary evidence and unopposed testimony, with defendant No.1 set exparte and other defendants treated as proforma parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 300088/2025 The Munsiff Court of Vatakara declared that Raghunath is the sole legal heir of Padmanabhan (under Hindu Succession Act Section 15(2)(b), as the property inherited by Padmanabhan's widow Jayalakshmi devolved to him as her husband's heir), and the plaintiffs (Raghunath's wife and daughter) are his legal heirs. The court allowed the declaration suit based on documentary evidence and unopposed testimony, with defendant No.1 set exparte and other defendants treated as proforma parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Vadakara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case