Smera K vs Brinda Ramesh — 300088/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 7 1. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 19th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKK300002692025
e-Filing Number
17-07-2025
Filing Number
279/2025
Filing Date
19-Jul-2025
Registration No
300088/2025
Registration Date
19-Jul-2025
Court
Munsiff Court, Vadakara
Judge
1-Munsiff
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smera K
Adv. KRISHNAN B
-
2.Raji Raghunath
Adv. KRISHNAN B
Respondent(s)
-
1.Brinda Ramesh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: 300088/2025 The Munsiff Court of Vatakara declared that Raghunath is the sole legal heir of Padmanabhan (under Hindu Succession Act Section 15(2)(b), as the property inherited by Padmanabhan's widow Jayalakshmi devolved to him as her husband's heir), and the plaintiffs (Raghunath's wife and daughter) are his legal heirs. The court allowed the declaration suit based on documentary evidence and unopposed testimony, with defendant No.1 set exparte and other defendants treated as proforma parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
Munsiff
-
16-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
28-Feb-2026
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
27-Feb-2026
Judge on leave / duty
Munsiff
-
23-Feb-2026
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff
-
20-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
09-Feb-2026
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
05-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
08-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
19-Nov-2025
For Steps
Munsiff
-
24-Oct-2025
Issue Summons
Munsiff
-
20-Aug-2025
For Steps
Munsiff
-
19-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 300088/2025
Case Summary: 300088/2025 The Munsiff Court of Vatakara declared that Raghunath is the sole legal heir of Padmanabhan (under Hindu Succession Act Section 15(2)(b), as the property inherited by Padmanabhan's widow Jayalakshmi devolved to him as her husband's heir), and the plaintiffs (Raghunath's wife and daughter) are his legal heirs. The court allowed the declaration suit based on documentary evidence and unopposed testimony, with defendant No.1 set exparte and other defendants treated as proforma parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts