Nanu vs Karuvankandi Leela Advocate - R1,2,4,5 K P Dinesan — 300051/2022
Case under Lease and Rent Control Act 1965 Section 11(3). Status: For Hearing. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLKK300002442022
e-Filing Number
27-05-2022
Filing Number
234/2022
Filing Date
30-May-2022
Registration No
300051/2022
Registration Date
30-May-2022
Court
Munsiff Court, Vadakara
Judge
1-Munsiff
Last updated 18-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nanu
Adv. PRADEEPAN K P
Respondent(s)
-
1.Karuvankandi Leela Advocate - R1,2,4,5 K P Dinesan
Case History
-
23-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Jul-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
29-Jun-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
11-Jun-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
05-Jun-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
26-May-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
01-Apr-2026
Listed to
Munsiff
-
19-Mar-2026
Listed to
Munsiff
-
10-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
26-Feb-2026
Listed to
Munsiff
-
17-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
13-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
05-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
22-Jan-2026
Listed to
Munsiff
-
09-Jan-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
12-Dec-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
04-Dec-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
24-Nov-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
14-Nov-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
07-Nov-2025
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
Munsiff
-
04-Nov-2025
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
Munsiff
-
23-Oct-2025
for evidence
Munsiff
-
18-Oct-2025
For cross examination.
Munsiff
-
07-Oct-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
29-Sep-2025
for evidence
Munsiff
-
22-Sep-2025
Judge on leave / duty
Munsiff
-
15-Sep-2025
for evidence
Munsiff
-
08-Sep-2025
For cross examination.
Munsiff
-
16-Jul-2025
Listed to
Munsiff
-
24-Jun-2025
For Steps
Munsiff
-
05-Jun-2025
For Steps
Munsiff
-
03-Apr-2025
For reports
Munsiff
-
27-Mar-2025
Appearance Of Parties
Munsiff
-
19-Feb-2025
For Payment
Munsiff
-
13-Feb-2025
Objection to Cr
Munsiff
-
05-Feb-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
23-Jan-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
18-Jan-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
10-Jan-2025
Prays time
Munsiff
-
11-Dec-2024
Prays time
Munsiff
-
06-Dec-2024
Judge on leave / duty
Munsiff
-
14-Nov-2024
For commission report
Munsiff
-
21-Oct-2024
For commission report
Munsiff
-
11-Sep-2024
For commission report
Munsiff
-
09-Sep-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
04-Sep-2024
For Counter
Munsiff
-
17-Aug-2024
For Steps
Munsiff
-
20-Jul-2024
Call on
Munsiff
-
20-Jul-2024
Restored
Munsiff
-
20-Jul-2024
Issue notice
Munsiff
-
30-Oct-2023
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: R.C.P. No. 51/2022 The Rent Controller, Vatakara allowed the eviction petition filed by Nanu against five respondents on October 30, 2023. Nanu sought eviction under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, claiming bonafide need of the leased tea shop building to start a household items business after returning from abroad. Since respondents failed to appear and contest the petition, the court proceeded exparte and found the petitioner's bonafide need established. The court ordered respondents to vacate within one month and awarded costs to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Oct-2023
Disposed
Munsiff
-
25-Oct-2023
Adjourned
Munsiff
-
26-Sep-2023
Listed to
Munsiff
-
18-Sep-2023
Call on
Munsiff
-
13-Sep-2023
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff
-
31-Jul-2023
Listed to
Munsiff
-
03-Jul-2023
For Steps
Munsiff
-
02-Jun-2023
For Steps
Munsiff
-
30-Mar-2023
For Steps
Munsiff
-
01-Mar-2023
For Steps
Munsiff
-
30-Jan-2023
For Steps
Munsiff
-
12-Jan-2023
For Steps
Munsiff
-
14-Dec-2022
For Steps
Munsiff
-
22-Nov-2022
For Steps
Munsiff
-
21-Oct-2022
For Counter
Munsiff
-
22-Sep-2022
For Counter
Munsiff
-
29-Aug-2022
For Counter
Munsiff
-
26-Jul-2022
For Counter
Munsiff
-
30-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-May-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 300051/2022
Case Summary: R.C.P. No. 51/2022 The Rent Controller, Vatakara allowed the eviction petition filed by Nanu against five respondents on October 30, 2023. Nanu sought eviction under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, claiming bonafide need of the leased tea shop building to start a household items business after returning from abroad. Since respondents failed to appear and contest the petition, the court proceeded exparte and found the petitioner's bonafide need established. The court ordered respondents to vacate within one month and awarded costs to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts