Kuruttipravan Veettil Pocker Haji vs Malliveettil Ibrahim Haji Advocate - P Divakaran — 300041/2022
Case under Lease and Rent Control Act 1965 Section 11(3). Status: For cross examination.. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLKK300002012022
e-Filing Number
08-04-2022
Filing Number
191/2022
Filing Date
11-Apr-2022
Registration No
300041/2022
Registration Date
11-Apr-2022
Court
Munsiff Court, Vadakara
Judge
1-Munsiff
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kuruttipravan Veettil Pocker Haji
Adv. ANIL RAJ K K
Respondent(s)
-
1.Malliveettil Ibrahim Haji Advocate - P Divakaran
Case History
-
28-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Mar-2026
For cross examination.
Munsiff
-
16-Mar-2026
For cross examination.
Munsiff
-
07-Mar-2026
For cross examination.
Munsiff
-
05-Mar-2026
For cross examination.
Munsiff
-
23-Feb-2026
Listed to
Munsiff
-
03-Feb-2026
For cross examination.
Munsiff
-
21-Jan-2026
With connected case
Munsiff
-
12-Jan-2026
Judge on leave / duty
Munsiff
-
29-Nov-2025
Listed to
Munsiff
-
25-Nov-2025
Appearance Of Parties
Munsiff
-
23-Oct-2025
Issue notice
Munsiff
-
23-Oct-2025
Disposed
Munsiff
-
09-Jan-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary Both rent control petitions (RCP 41/2022 and RCP 107/2022) filed by the petitioner against the respondent were allowed. An eviction order was passed under Sections 11(2)(b), 11(4)(i), and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The respondent was directed to vacate the leased shop room and hand it over to the petitioner within one month, with the petitioner also awarded costs. The court found the respondent had defaulted on rent since January 2022, unlawfully sublet the premises, and accepted the petitioner's bona fide need for the property for his daughter's bakery business. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jan-2025
—
Munsiff
-
07-Jan-2025
With connected case
Munsiff
-
25-Oct-2024
Call on
Munsiff
-
21-Oct-2024
Call on
Munsiff
-
17-Oct-2024
Prays time
Munsiff
-
09-Oct-2024
Call on
Munsiff
-
27-Sep-2024
For Steps
Munsiff
-
02-Sep-2024
Call on
Munsiff
-
02-Sep-2024
Restored
Munsiff
-
02-Sep-2024
Issue notice
Munsiff
-
07-Mar-2024
OrderView PDF
-
07-Mar-2024
Disposed
Munsiff
-
01-Mar-2024
for evidence
Munsiff
-
29-Feb-2024
Restored
Munsiff
-
29-Feb-2024
Call on
Munsiff
-
29-Feb-2024
Issue notice
Munsiff
-
06-Feb-2024
Disposed
Munsiff
-
13-Nov-2023
Listed to
Munsiff
-
18-Oct-2023
For Steps
Munsiff
-
20-Sep-2023
Call on
Munsiff
-
04-Sep-2023
Call on
Munsiff
-
01-Aug-2023
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff
-
11-Jul-2023
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff
-
03-Jul-2023
For Steps
Munsiff
-
13-Jun-2023
For Steps
Munsiff
-
07-Jun-2023
For Steps
Munsiff
-
22-May-2023
For Steps
Munsiff
-
17-Mar-2023
For Steps
Munsiff
-
13-Feb-2023
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
11-Jan-2023
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
13-Dec-2022
For Steps
Munsiff
-
19-Nov-2022
For Steps
Munsiff
-
22-Oct-2022
For Steps
Munsiff
-
22-Sep-2022
For Counter
Munsiff
-
16-Aug-2022
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
16-Jul-2022
For Counter
Munsiff
-
13-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 300041/2022
Summary Both rent control petitions (RCP 41/2022 and RCP 107/2022) filed by the petitioner against the respondent were allowed. An eviction order was passed under Sections 11(2)(b), 11(4)(i), and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The respondent was directed to vacate the leased shop room and hand it over to the petitioner within one month, with the petitioner also awarded costs. The court found the respondent had defaulted on rent since January 2022, unlawfully sublet the premises, and accepted the petitioner's bona fide need for the property for his daughter's bakery business. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts