Shereef. B vs Muhammed Suhail Advocate - NASAR — 200070/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26, order VII, rule 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKK290003752022

Filing Number

180/2022

Filing Date

04-Nov-2022

Registration No

200070/2022

Registration Date

04-Nov-2022

Court

Sub Court, Vatakara

Judge

1-Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26, order VII, rule 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shereef. B

    Adv. Afnas M T

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Muhammed Suhail Advocate - NASAR

  2. 2.Thasneem. M

    Adv. NASAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  3. 25-Feb-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing on Last chance

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Both not ready

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Further evidence

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    For Defendent Evidence

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  9. 05-Dec-2025

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  10. 01-Dec-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  11. 28-Nov-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  12. 22-Nov-2025

    Disposed

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  13. 31-Jan-2025

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary Court Decision: The Subordinate Judge of Vatakara granted the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement (OS 70/2022). The defendants are directed to execute and register the sale deed for the 13½ cent residential property in favor of the plaintiff within two months, provided the plaintiff deposits the remaining sale consideration (₹20 lakhs) within one month. Key Reasoning: The court found the plaintiff's unchallenged testimony and documentary evidence (registered sale agreement dated 05/10/2021, prior sale deeds, and lawyer's notice) sufficient to prove the defendants breached their contractual obligation to register the sale deed. The defendants' defense that the agreement was executed under coercion was rejected as they presented no evidence and did not cross-examine the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 31-Jan-2025

    —

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  15. 24-Jan-2025

    Order/Judgement

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  16. 23-Jan-2025

    For- evidence

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  17. 04-Jan-2025

    For- evidence

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  18. 17-Dec-2024

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  19. 14-Nov-2024

    For Steps

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  20. 10-Oct-2024

    Bcf and steps

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  21. 25-Sep-2024

    Bcf and steps

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  22. 23-Sep-2024

    Bcf and steps

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  23. 20-Jul-2024

    Bcf and steps

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  24. 18-Jun-2024

    Bcf and steps

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  25. 21-May-2024

    Bcf and steps

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  26. 29-Feb-2024

    Issues

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  27. 29-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  28. 16-Dec-2023

    Issues

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  29. 14-Sep-2023

    Appearance Of Parties

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  30. 05-Aug-2023

    For settlement

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  31. 24-Jul-2023

    For settlement

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  32. 07-Jun-2023

    Call with IA

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  33. 10-Apr-2023

    Bcf and steps

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  34. 18-Mar-2023

    Bcf and steps

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  35. 03-Mar-2023

    Bcf and steps

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  36. 02-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  37. 03-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  38. 05-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 04-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200070/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The Subordinate Judge of Vatakara granted the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement (OS 70/2022). The defendants are directed to execute and register the sale deed for the 13½ cent residential property in favor of the plaintiff within two months, provided the plaintiff deposits the remaining sale consideration (₹20 lakhs) within one month. Key Reasoning: The court found the plaintiff's unchallenged testimony and documentary evidence (registered sale agreement dated 05/10/2021, prior sale deeds, and lawyer's notice) sufficient to prove the defendants breached their contractual obligation to register the sale deed. The defendants' defense that the agreement was executed under coercion was rejected as they presented no evidence and did not cross-examine the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case