Shereef. B vs Muhammed Suhail Advocate - NASAR — 200070/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26, order VII, rule 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKK290003752022
Filing Number
180/2022
Filing Date
04-11-2022
Registration No
200070/2022
Registration Date
04-11-2022
Court
Sub Court, Vatakara
Judge
1-Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shereef. B
Adv. Afnas M T
Respondent(s)
Muhammed Suhail Advocate - NASAR
Thasneem. M
Adv. NASAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Hearing on Last chance
Both not ready
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 24-02-2026 | Hearing on Last chance |
| 20-02-2026 | Both not ready |
| 13-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court Decision: The Subordinate Judge of Vatakara granted the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement (OS 70/2022). The defendants are directed to execute and register the sale deed for the 13½ cent residential property in favor of the plaintiff within two months, provided the plaintiff deposits the remaining sale consideration (₹20 lakhs) within one month. Key Reasoning: The court found the plaintiff's unchallenged testimony and documentary evidence (registered sale agreement dated 05/10/2021, prior sale deeds, and lawyer's notice) sufficient to prove the defendants breached their contractual obligation to register the sale deed. The defendants' defense that the agreement was executed under coercion was rejected as they presented no evidence and did not cross-examine the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court Decision: The Subordinate Judge of Vatakara granted the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement (OS 70/2022). The defendants are directed to execute and register the sale deed for the 13½ cent residential property in favor of the plaintiff within two months, provided the plaintiff deposits the remaining sale consideration (₹20 lakhs) within one month. Key Reasoning: The court found the plaintiff's unchallenged testimony and documentary evidence (registered sale agreement dated 05/10/2021, prior sale deeds, and lawyer's notice) sufficient to prove the defendants breached their contractual obligation to register the sale deed. The defendants' defense that the agreement was executed under coercion was rejected as they presented no evidence and did not cross-examine the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts