Muhammed Rafeeque Kaarorath vs P Shareef Advocate - P. Divakaran, Sylaja — 200067/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26, order 7, rule. Status: Payment of balance court fee.. Next hearing: 31st March 2026.

Payment of balance court fee. Next hearing 31-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKK290003612023

e-Filing Number

10-08-2023

Filing Number

168/2023

Filing Date

11-Aug-2023

Registration No

200067/2023

Registration Date

11-Aug-2023

Court

Sub Court, Vatakara

Judge

1-Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26, order 7, rule

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Muhammed Rafeeque Kaarorath

    Adv. MUHAMMED SADIQUE UK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.P Shareef Advocate - P. Divakaran, Sylaja

  2. 2.Kunhabdulla Haji

    Adv. M.K. Balakrishnan

Case History

  1. 31-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Payment of balance court fee.

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  3. 27-Feb-2026

    Call on

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Call on

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Call on

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  7. 15-Nov-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  8. 29-Oct-2025

    Call on

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  9. 08-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  10. 26-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  11. 25-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  12. 24-Jun-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The application filed by plaintiff Muhammad Rafeeq Karorath under Order 13 Rule 9 CPC to return the original Sale Deed No. 1701 of 2023 (subject matter of the case) and replace it with a certified copy has been dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's claim that the original deed was needed urgently for the Village Office, noting that the deed is a crucial material object in ongoing criminal case Crime No. 608 of 2023 (involving allegations of forgery under IPC Sections 463, 465, 468, 471, 420, and 34), and granting the request would be inappropriate given the pending criminal investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 24-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  14. 18-Jun-2025

    Orders in IA

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  15. 11-Apr-2025

    Call with IA

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  16. 12-Mar-2025

    Call with IA

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  17. 07-Feb-2025

    Call with IA

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  18. 23-Jan-2025

    Call with IA

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  19. 10-Dec-2024

    Call with IA

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  20. 29-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  21. 07-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  22. 04-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  23. 22-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  24. 17-Jul-2024

    Issues

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  25. 13-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  26. 23-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  27. 07-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  28. 06-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  29. 20-Nov-2023

    For Steps

    Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge

  30. 12-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 11-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200067/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application filed by plaintiff Muhammad Rafeeq Karorath under Order 13 Rule 9 CPC to return the original Sale Deed No. 1701 of 2023 (subject matter of the case) and replace it with a certified copy has been dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's claim that the original deed was needed urgently for the Village Office, noting that the deed is a crucial material object in ongoing criminal case Crime No. 608 of 2023 (involving allegations of forgery under IPC Sections 463, 465, 468, 471, 420, and 34), and granting the request would be inappropriate given the pending criminal investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case