Basheer vs Andru Haji Alias Abdurahiman Haji Advocate - C. Subramannian, P. Anoop — 200072/2011
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S.26Order7Rule1CPC. Status: Stayed. Call on. Next hearing: 05th September 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKK290002972011
Filing Number
200072/2011
Filing Date
08-Apr-2011
Registration No
200072/2011
Registration Date
08-Apr-2011
Court
Sub Court, Vatakara
Judge
1-Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
Last updated 18-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Basheer
Adv. K.V. Sasidhara and E.K. Remesh
Respondent(s)
-
1.Andru Haji Alias Abdurahiman Haji Advocate - C. Subramannian, P. Anoop
-
2.Veeraliambath Mariyam
Adv. C. Subramannian, P. Anoop
-
3.Afsal
Adv. P. balagopalan, T.K. Arun Kumar
-
4.Asma
Adv. P. Divakaran
-
5.Noorjahan
Adv. P. Divakaran
Case History
-
05-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
26-May-2026
Stayed. Call on
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Stayed. Call on
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Stayed. Call on
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
22-Oct-2025
Call on
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
21-Aug-2025
Stayed. Call on
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
16-Jul-2025
Call on
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
23-Jun-2025
Stay report
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
11-Jun-2025
Stay report
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
05-Jun-2025
Stay report
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
24-May-2025
Stay report
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
20-May-2025
Stay report
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
09-Apr-2025
Call on
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
05-Apr-2025
Call on
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2025
Call on
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
26-Mar-2025
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: OS 72/2011 - IA 01/2025 Court: Subordinate Judge, Vatakara Date: 26 March 2025 Outcome: Application dismissed with costs. Defendants Andru Haji and Mariyam sought to amend their written statement to raise a counterclaim for Rs. 24,50,000, arguing plaintiffs gained unfair advantage in a property transaction. The court rejected the amendment application on two grounds: (1) it was filed after trial commenced without demonstrating due diligence, and (2) the counterclaim was barred by limitation—the cause of action arose in 2009 but was raised only in 2025, exceeding the three-year limitation period under the Limitation Act, 1963. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2025
Defence Evidence
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2025
Orders in IA
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
22-Mar-2025
For Counter
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
19-Mar-2025
Defence Evidence
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
15-Mar-2025
Defence Evidence
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2025
Declared Major,Release Fdr
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
06-Feb-2025
Listed to
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
07-Jan-2025
For reports
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
04-Jan-2025
Appearance Of Parties
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
19-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
05-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
22-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2024
Call on
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2024
Restored
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2024
carry out impleadment
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
30-Jul-2013
Order Number 1View PDF
-
30-Jul-2013
Disposed
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
29-Jul-2013
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
23-Jul-2013
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
09-Jul-2013
Order/Judgement
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
04-Jul-2013
Issue stope memo
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
27-Jun-2013
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
25-Jun-2013
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
11-Jun-2013
Call on
Sub Judge/Asst.sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2013
Call on
-
06-Feb-2013
For Steps
-
13-Dec-2012
Call on
-
16-Nov-2012
Call on
-
15-Oct-2012
Payment of balance court fee.
-
13-Sep-2012
Call on
-
24-Jul-2012
Issues
-
16-Jun-2012
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Apr-2011
Case filed
Registration No. 200072/2011
Case Summary: OS 72/2011 - IA 01/2025 Court: Subordinate Judge, Vatakara Date: 26 March 2025 Outcome: Application dismissed with costs. Defendants Andru Haji and Mariyam sought to amend their written statement to raise a counterclaim for Rs. 24,50,000, arguing plaintiffs gained unfair advantage in a property transaction. The court rejected the amendment application on two grounds: (1) it was filed after trial commenced without demonstrating due diligence, and (2) the counterclaim was barred by limitation—the cause of action arose in 2009 but was raised only in 2025, exceeding the three-year limitation period under the Limitation Act, 1963. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts