Chavatti Parambil Baby Kamala vs Shiju — 106/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Stay report. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKK230003122018
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
310/2018
Filing Date
19-12-2018
Registration No
106/2018
Registration Date
19-12-2018
Court
Munsiff Court, Payyoli
Judge
1-Munsiff-Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chavatti Parambil Baby Kamala
Adv. N.K.Parameswaran and Sathyan.P.Thampi, N.K.Parameswaran and Sathyan.P.Thampi
Lisha
Adv. P Divakaran
Vattaparambil Dheeshjith,Rep. by Anoop kumar
Adv. P Divakaran
Respondent(s)
Shiju
K.T.Ramesan
Sureshbabu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff-Magistrate
Stay report
Call with IA
Call with IA
Call with IA
Call with IA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Stay report |
| 03-06-2026 | Call with IA |
| 02-06-2026 | Call with IA |
| 01-06-2026 | Call with IA |
| 30-05-2026 | Call with IA |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 106/2018 Outcome: Suit decreed with costs. The court issued a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants and their men from obstructing the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of their properties, trespassing, widening the pathway, or committing acts of waste. Key Facts: Plaintiffs owned properties in Iringal Village, Kozhikode. Defendants demanded they surrender land to widen an existing pathway; when plaintiffs refused (due to coconut trees), defendants threatened trespass. Defendants failed to appear at trial, and the court decreed the suit based on unrebutted evidence from the second plaintiff's testimony and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 106/2018 Outcome: Suit decreed with costs. The court issued a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants and their men from obstructing the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of their properties, trespassing, widening the pathway, or committing acts of waste. Key Facts: Plaintiffs owned properties in Iringal Village, Kozhikode. Defendants demanded they surrender land to widen an existing pathway; when plaintiffs refused (due to coconut trees), defendants threatened trespass. Defendants failed to appear at trial, and the court decreed the suit based on unrebutted evidence from the second plaintiff's testimony and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts