Jasna vs Dineesh — 37/2020

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED. on 31st March 2026.

MC - MISCELLANEOUS & MAINTENANCE CASE

CNR: KLKK220019272020

Case disposed

Filing Number

37/2020

Filing Date

28-09-2020

Registration No

37/2020

Registration Date

28-09-2020

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Koyilandy

Judge

1-Judicial First class Magistrate

Decision Date

31st March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED.

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12
Crl.mp/1/2026 Classification : Execution Petition Section JasnaDineesh
Crl.mp(ab)/1/2026 Classification : Absent Petition Section JasnaDineesh

Petitioner(s)

Jasna

Adv. Lal Kishore C

Respondent(s)

Dineesh

Babu

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial First class Magistrate

31-03-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

19-03-2026

For affidavit.

16-03-2026

For affidavit.

25-02-2026

FOR HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

31-03-2026
Final Order

Case Summary: MC 37/2020 Court Decision: The petition is allowed in part. The court found that Jasna (petitioner) suffered domestic violence from her husband Dineesh P (first respondent) and awarded her ₹1,00,000 as compensation, ₹20,000 monthly maintenance, and a protection order, while dismissing claims against the second respondent (Dineesh's father). Key Facts: Jasna married Dineesh on 15 December 2019, but within days he spent most time with his friend Shamil, forcing her to work as a domestic servant, pledge her gold ornaments, and endure physical and mental harassment. She filed for domestic violence protection under the 2005 Act, claiming ₹15 lakhs compensation and ₹25,000 monthly maintenance. Court Reasoning: Though Jasna produced no independent witnesses or medical evidence, the court accepted her sole testimony as credible and convincing, relying on precedent that victim testimony suffices under the Act. The court reduced compensation to ₹1,00,000 due to lack of quantifiable damages and fixed maintenance at ₹20,000 monthly (below her ₹25,000 claim) based on the husband's salary and her lack of income. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MC 37/2020 Court Decision: The petition is allowed in part. The court found that Jasna (petitioner) suffered domestic violence from her husband Dineesh P (first respondent) and awarded her ₹1,00,000 as compensation, ₹20,000 monthly maintenance, and a protection order, while dismissing claims against the second respondent (Dineesh's father). Key Facts: Jasna married Dineesh on 15 December 2019, but within days he spent most time with his friend Shamil, forcing her to work as a domestic servant, pledge her gold ornaments, and endure physical and mental harassment. She filed for domestic violence protection under the 2005 Act, claiming ₹15 lakhs compensation and ₹25,000 monthly maintenance. Court Reasoning: Though Jasna produced no independent witnesses or medical evidence, the court accepted her sole testimony as credible and convincing, relying on precedent that victim testimony suffices under the Act. The court reduced compensation to ₹1,00,000 due to lack of quantifiable damages and fixed maintenance at ₹20,000 monthly (below her ₹25,000 claim) based on the husband's salary and her lack of income. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Koyilandy All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case