Koyilandy Police station vs Nidheesh Advocate - Umendran P T — 406/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,332,392rw34. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKK220007282018
Filing Number
406/2018
Filing Date
14-06-2018
Registration No
406/2018
Registration Date
14-06-2018
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Koyilandy
Judge
1-Judicial First class Magistrate
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
442
Police Station
Koyilandy PS
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Koyilandy Police station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Nidheesh Advocate - Umendran P T
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First class Magistrate
Disposed
For further hearing
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | For further hearing |
| 08-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 27-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 21-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted Nidheesh of charges under IPC sections 323, 332, 392 r/w 34 and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act 1984, finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the injured witnesses (PW2 and PW3) could not convincingly identify the accused, lacked prior acquaintance with him, the incident occurred in darkness with multiple assailants present, and no independent witnesses corroborated their claims. The accused was released and his bail bond cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted Nidheesh of charges under IPC sections 323, 332, 392 r/w 34 and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act 1984, finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the injured witnesses (PW2 and PW3) could not convincingly identify the accused, lacked prior acquaintance with him, the incident occurred in darkness with multiple assailants present, and no independent witnesses corroborated their claims. The accused was released and his bail bond cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts