SHO Koyilandy vs Ratheesh Babu A K Advocate - Sajith P B — 282/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A), 406. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 30th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKK220004542020
Filing Number
282/2020
Filing Date
26-05-2020
Registration No
282/2020
Registration Date
26-05-2020
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Koyilandy
Judge
1-Judicial First class Magistrate
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
133
Police Station
Koyilandy PS
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO (Station House Officer) Koyilandy
Adv. Assistant public prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Ratheesh Babu A K Advocate - Sajith P B
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 04-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 25-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC No. 282/2020 Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted Ratheesh Babu A K of charges under IPC Sections 498A (cruelty to wife) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) on March 30, 2026, finding the prosecution failed to prove allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found the complainant's allegations lacked specific dates, times, and details of alleged cruelties. Significantly, the accused's passport evidence showed he was abroad when the complainant claimed an assault occurred on 27.07.2017, contradicting her testimony. Additionally, the prosecution failed to produce bills, photographs, medical records, or documentary evidence to substantiate claims of misappropriated gold ornaments or that they were formally entrusted to the accused. Witness testimony was largely hearsay and inconsistent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC No. 282/2020 Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted Ratheesh Babu A K of charges under IPC Sections 498A (cruelty to wife) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) on March 30, 2026, finding the prosecution failed to prove allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found the complainant's allegations lacked specific dates, times, and details of alleged cruelties. Significantly, the accused's passport evidence showed he was abroad when the complainant claimed an assault occurred on 27.07.2017, contradicting her testimony. Additionally, the prosecution failed to produce bills, photographs, medical records, or documentary evidence to substantiate claims of misappropriated gold ornaments or that they were formally entrusted to the accused. Witness testimony was largely hearsay and inconsistent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts