SHO Koyilandy vs Ratheesh Babu A K Advocate - Sajith P B — 282/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A), 406. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKK220004542020

Filing Number

282/2020

Filing Date

26-May-2020

Registration No

282/2020

Registration Date

26-May-2020

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Koyilandy

Judge

1-Judicial First class Magistrate

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AQUITTED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

133

Police Station

Koyilandy PS

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498(A), 406

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) Koyilandy

    Adv. Assistant public prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ratheesh Babu A K Advocate - Sajith P B

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: CC No. 282/2020 Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted Ratheesh Babu A K of charges under IPC Sections 498A (cruelty to wife) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) on March 30, 2026, finding the prosecution failed to prove allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found the complainant's allegations lacked specific dates, times, and details of alleged cruelties. Significantly, the accused's passport evidence showed he was abroad when the complainant claimed an assault occurred on 27.07.2017, contradicting her testimony. Additionally, the prosecution failed to produce bills, photographs, medical records, or documentary evidence to substantiate claims of misappropriated gold ornaments or that they were formally entrusted to the accused. Witness testimony was largely hearsay and inconsistent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    For Steps

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    For Steps

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  11. 27-Nov-2025

    For Steps

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  12. 05-Nov-2025

    BW to cws

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  13. 08-Oct-2025

    BW to cws

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  14. 10-Sep-2025

    To summon witness

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  15. 11-Aug-2025

    To summon witness

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  16. 11-Jul-2025

    To summon witness

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  17. 17-Jun-2025

    To summon witness

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  18. 15-May-2025

    To summon witness

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  19. 03-Apr-2025

    Issue NBW

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  20. 21-Feb-2025

    For Objection and hearing

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  21. 20-Jan-2025

    To summon witness

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  22. 12-Dec-2024

    To summon witness

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  23. 08-Nov-2024

    To summon witness

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  24. 24-Sep-2024

    To summon witness

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  25. 16-Aug-2024

    To summon witness

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  26. 11-Jul-2024

    To summon witness

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  27. 06-Jun-2024

    To summon witness

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  28. 08-May-2024

    To summon witness

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  29. 22-Mar-2024

    To summon witness

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  30. 19-Feb-2024

    for evidence

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  31. 18-Jan-2024

    BW to cws

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  32. 19-Dec-2023

    BW to cws

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  33. 16-Nov-2023

    BW to cws

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  34. 25-Sep-2023

    BW to cws

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  35. 20-Jul-2023

    BW to cws

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  36. 20-May-2023

    To summon witness

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  37. 28-Mar-2023

    Hearing on Charge

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  38. 01-Dec-2022

    Hearing on Charge

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  39. 29-Aug-2022

    Hearing on Charge

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  40. 12-Jul-2022

    Hearing on Charge

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  41. 20-May-2022

    Hearing on Charge

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  42. 11-Mar-2022

    Hearing on Charge

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  43. 06-Jan-2022

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  44. 05-Nov-2021

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  45. 25-Aug-2021

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  46. 02-Jun-2021

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  47. 25-Mar-2021

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  48. 30-Dec-2020

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  49. 26-Aug-2020

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First class Magistrate

  50. 24-Aug-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 26-May-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 282/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 282/2020 Decision: The Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted Ratheesh Babu A K of charges under IPC Sections 498A (cruelty to wife) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) on March 30, 2026, finding the prosecution failed to prove allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found the complainant's allegations lacked specific dates, times, and details of alleged cruelties. Significantly, the accused's passport evidence showed he was abroad when the complainant claimed an assault occurred on 27.07.2017, contradicting her testimony. Additionally, the prosecution failed to produce bills, photographs, medical records, or documentary evidence to substantiate claims of misappropriated gold ornaments or that they were formally entrusted to the accused. Witness testimony was largely hearsay and inconsistent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case