Sivadasan Rep. by POA holder Manojkumar vs Madhusoodhanan — 11/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s26,Ord.7,Rule1. Status: For commission report. Next hearing: 23rd May 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKK210000502022

For commission report

Next Hearing

23rd May 2026

Filing Number

48/2022

Filing Date

08-02-2022

Registration No

11/2022

Registration Date

08-02-2022

Court

Munsiff Court,Koyilandy

Judge

1-Munsiff/JFCM-2

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s26,Ord.7,Rule1
Ia(fda)/1/2023 Classification : Final Decree Application Section Sivadasan Rep. by POA holder ManojkumarMadhusoodhanan
Ia/1/2025 Classification : Section Sivadasan Rep. by POA holder ManojkumarMadhusoodhanan

Petitioner(s)

Sivadasan Rep. by POA holder Manojkumar

Adv. N. Jalaludheen and Sindhu. K.P

Respondent(s)

Madhusoodhanan

Valsala

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff/JFCM-2

23-03-2026

For commission report

07-03-2026

For commission report

24-02-2026

Call with IA

02-02-2026

For commission report

20-01-2026

For commission report

Interim Orders

23-09-2023
Judgement

Summary: In Original Suit No. 11/2022 at the Munsiff Court, Koyilandy, the petition for property partition was allowed in favor of the Plaintiff. The court decreed that the Plaintiff is entitled to 26 out of 28 shares in the suit property, while each Defendant is entitled to 1/28 share. The Plaintiff was also awarded costs of the suit to be recovered from the Defendants. The case was decided ex-parte as the Defendants failed to appear despite service of summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Original Suit No. 11/2022 at the Munsiff Court, Koyilandy, the petition for property partition was allowed in favor of the Plaintiff. The court decreed that the Plaintiff is entitled to 26 out of 28 shares in the suit property, while each Defendant is entitled to 1/28 share. The Plaintiff was also awarded costs of the suit to be recovered from the Defendants. The case was decided ex-parte as the Defendants failed to appear despite service of summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Munsiff Court,Koyilandy All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case