Nambarath Balan vs Pramod Advocate - N.K. Rajan and C. Ullas — 2/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s151,Ord.26,Rule9. Status: For commission report. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

For commission report Next hearing 03-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKK210000022023

Filing Number

2/2023

Filing Date

03-Jan-2023

Registration No

2/2023

Registration Date

03-Jan-2023

Court

Munsiff Court,Koyilandy

Judge

1-Munsiff/Jfcm-2

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s151,Ord.26,Rule9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nambarath Balan

    Adv. Prabhakaran. P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pramod Advocate - N.K. Rajan and C. Ullas

  2. 2.Sajan

    Adv. RAJAN NK

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    For commission report

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    For commission report

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    For commission report

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  5. 15-Oct-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  6. 10-Sep-2025

    Verify and report

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  7. 23-Aug-2025

    For Counter in IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  8. 14-Aug-2025

    Verify and report

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  9. 16-Jul-2025

    For Steps

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  10. 19-Jun-2025

    OrderView PDF

  11. 19-Jun-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 2/2023 (IA 07/2023) The Munsiff Court dismissed the 1st Defendant Pramod Kumar's application to remit the Advocate Commissioner's inspection report. The court found Kumar failed to establish that the Commissioner failed to ascertain matters as required. However, the court acknowledged that additional matters Kumar raised regarding pathways, roads, and temple access are necessary for fair adjudication and directed Kumar to file a separate application appointing a new Advocate Commissioner to investigate those specific issues. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 19-Jun-2025

    For Steps

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  13. 04-Jun-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  14. 27-May-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  15. 21-Feb-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  16. 07-Dec-2024

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  17. 25-Oct-2024

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  18. 27-Jul-2024

    For Hearing

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  19. 21-May-2024

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  20. 12-Mar-2024

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  21. 20-Jan-2024

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  22. 14-Dec-2023

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  23. 08-Nov-2023

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  24. 12-Oct-2023

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  25. 15-Sep-2023

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  26. 03-Aug-2023

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  27. 06-Jul-2023

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  28. 12-Jun-2023

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  29. 10-Apr-2023

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  30. 13-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 03-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 2/2023 (IA 07/2023) The Munsiff Court dismissed the 1st Defendant Pramod Kumar's application to remit the Advocate Commissioner's inspection report. The court found Kumar failed to establish that the Commissioner failed to ascertain matters as required. However, the court acknowledged that additional matters Kumar raised regarding pathways, roads, and temple access are necessary for fair adjudication and directed Kumar to file a separate application appointing a new Advocate Commissioner to investigate those specific issues. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case