Kalluvalappil Raveendran vs Ramakrishnan — 38/2024

Summary of Case 38/2024: Kalluvalappil Raveendran v. Ramakrishnan The Subordinate Judge dismissed the defendant's appeal and confirmed the lower court's judgment granting the plaintiff a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining unauthorized trespass and property damage. The court found the plaintiff established co-ownership and possession of the disputed property (Schedule A and B), which were clearly identifiable; the defendant had demolished a boundary wall and removed soil from the property, creating sufficient cause of action for injunctive relief. However, the mandatory injunction requiring restoration was properly denied due to insufficient evidence directly proving the defendant's involvement in demolition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.