S.H.O.Medical College P.S vs Abdul Jabbar P — 264/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 01st April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKK170011952021
Filing Number
264/2021
Filing Date
22-11-2021
Registration No
264/2021
Registration Date
22-11-2021
Court
JFCM Court, Kunnamangalam
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kunnamangalam
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
1121
Police Station
Medical College PS
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.H.O.Medical College P.S
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Abdul Jabbar P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kunnamangalam
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Report on mediation
Show casue to Investigating Officer
Appearance of Accused
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 30-01-2026 | Report on mediation |
| 20-11-2025 | Show casue to Investigating Officer |
| 29-09-2025 | Appearance of Accused |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC 264/2021 Abdul Jabbar P was acquitted of charges under IPC Section 392 (dacoity/snatching) after the prosecution failed to establish its case. The sole prosecution witness, the alleged victim, turned hostile and testified that she could not identify who snatched her bag and that the case had been settled with the accused. With no material evidence connecting the accused to the alleged incident and the key witness unable to identify him, the court found insufficient grounds for conviction and acquitted the accused under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 264/2021 Abdul Jabbar P was acquitted of charges under IPC Section 392 (dacoity/snatching) after the prosecution failed to establish its case. The sole prosecution witness, the alleged victim, turned hostile and testified that she could not identify who snatched her bag and that the case had been settled with the accused. With no material evidence connecting the accused to the alleged incident and the key witness unable to identify him, the court found insufficient grounds for conviction and acquitted the accused under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts