Haridasan Gopalan , S/o. Gopalan vs Shynesh C K, S/o. Narayanan Advocate - P.O.Radhakrishnan — 812/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED U/S 255(2) CR.PC on 30th May 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLKK160009122022
Filing Number
891/2022
Filing Date
18-May-2022
Registration No
812/2022
Registration Date
18-May-2022
Court
JFCM VI Kozhikode, Eranhipalam
Judge
1-Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
30-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED U/S 255(2) CR.PC
Last updated 18-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Haridasan Gopalan , S/o. Gopalan
Adv. Adv. D Mohandas
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shynesh C K, S/o. Narayanan Advocate - P.O.Radhakrishnan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-May-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: ST No. 812/2022 Court Decision: The Special Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kozhikode, convicted Shynesh C K under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing cheques without sufficient funds. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.15,03,000 (covering principal plus 9% interest for 67 months) as compensation, with three months simple imprisonment as default penalty. Key Reasoning: The court found all statutory requirements satisfied—the cheque was returned for insufficient funds, proper legal notice was served, and the complaint filed within prescribed timelines. The accused's admission of liability under a dated agreement (Ext P6), combined with failure to rebut the statutory presumption, established the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt. The accused's unsupported defense that cheques were security instruments lacked cogent evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-May-2026
Disposed
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
26-May-2026
Order/Judgement
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-May-2026
For further hearing
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
15-May-2026
Order/Judgement
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Apr-2026
For Hearing
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
04-Apr-2026
Issue production warrant
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Issue NBW
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Order/Judgement
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
17-Feb-2026
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
11-Feb-2026
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
07-Feb-2026
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
30-Jan-2026
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
31-Dec-2025
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2025
For further hearing
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
13-Nov-2025
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
05-Nov-2025
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Oct-2025
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
04-Oct-2025
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
24-Sep-2025
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
11-Sep-2025
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
01-Sep-2025
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Aug-2025
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
26-Jul-2025
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Jul-2025
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
08-Jul-2025
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
30-Jun-2025
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
25-Jun-2025
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
05-Jun-2025
With connected case
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
07-May-2025
Appearance Of Parties
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2025
Appearance Of Parties
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
19-Oct-2024
Appearance Of Parties
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
29-Aug-2024
Appearance Of Parties
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
06-Aug-2024
Appearance Of Parties
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
24-Jul-2024
Objection
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-Jul-2024
Defence Evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
06-Jul-2024
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
22-Jun-2024
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
10-Jun-2024
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
18-May-2024
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-Apr-2024
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-Mar-2024
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
04-Jan-2024
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
08-Nov-2023
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
07-Sep-2023
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
05-Aug-2023
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
04-Jul-2023
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-Jun-2023
Call on
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
17-Jun-2023
Call with Mp
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
29-May-2023
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
15-Mar-2023
Adjourned
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
29-Dec-2022
Appearance of Accused
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2022
Appearance of Accused
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
12-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-May-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 812/2022
Case Summary: ST No. 812/2022 Court Decision: The Special Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kozhikode, convicted Shynesh C K under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing cheques without sufficient funds. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.15,03,000 (covering principal plus 9% interest for 67 months) as compensation, with three months simple imprisonment as default penalty. Key Reasoning: The court found all statutory requirements satisfied—the cheque was returned for insufficient funds, proper legal notice was served, and the complaint filed within prescribed timelines. The accused's admission of liability under a dated agreement (Ext P6), combined with failure to rebut the statutory presumption, established the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt. The accused's unsupported defense that cheques were security instruments lacked cogent evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts