Feroke Police Station, Kozhikode vs Sathar , S/o. Moideen Advocate - STEPHY JOSHI C — 31/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 447,341,323r/w34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 22nd May 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKK160003672022
Filing Number
348/2022
Filing Date
14-Mar-2022
Registration No
31/2022
Registration Date
15-Mar-2022
Court
JFCM VI Kozhikode, Eranhipalam
Judge
1-Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
22-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
102
Police Station
Feroke PS
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Feroke Police Station, Kozhikode
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sathar , S/o. Moideen Advocate - STEPHY JOSHI C
-
2.Ahammed Farhan , S/o. Ummer
Adv. STEPHY JOSHI C
-
3.Shamsseer, S/o. Beerankutty
Adv. STEPHY JOSHI C
-
4.Muhammed Shafi, S/o.Koyali
Adv. STEPHY JOSHI C
-
5.Muhammed Abdul Sameer, S/o. Muhammedali
Adv. STEPHY JOSHI C
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-May-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary of Case 31/2022 The Special Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted all five accused (Sathar, Ahammed Parhan, Shamsseer, Muhammed Shafi, and Muhammed Abdul Sameer) of charges under IPC Sections 447, 341, and 323 r/w 34 for alleged criminal trespass, wrongful restraint, and assault on January 24, 2021. The key witness—the de facto complainant—turned hostile and stated she could not identify her assailants, while the other witness also failed to provide incriminating evidence. Finding insufficient prosecution evidence, the court acquitted all accused and set them at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-May-2026
Disposed
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
19-May-2026
Order/Judgement
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
14-May-2026
For Hearing
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
13-May-2026
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
21-Apr-2026
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
18-Apr-2026
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
17-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Call with Mp
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Apr-2026
Call with Mp
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
10-Apr-2026
Call with Mp
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
08-Apr-2026
Call with Mp
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
06-Apr-2026
Call with Mp
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
31-Mar-2026
Call with Mp
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
28-Mar-2026
Call with Mp
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2026
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
repeat NBW
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
06-Feb-2026
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
07-Jan-2026
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
02-Dec-2025
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
07-Nov-2025
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
26-Sep-2025
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
23-Aug-2025
For evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
01-Aug-2025
for evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
03-Jul-2025
for evidence
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
12-Jun-2025
Return of warrant
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
12-May-2025
Return of warrant
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
09-May-2025
Odering Cmp
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
08-May-2025
For objecting & hearing Cmp
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2025
For objecting & hearing Cmp
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
01-Apr-2025
For settlement
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2025
For settlement
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2025
Referred to Mediator
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
14-Jan-2025
Referred to Mediator
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
13-Dec-2024
Referred to Mediator
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2024
Referred to Mediator
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2024
Referred to Mediator
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
27-Sep-2024
Referred to Mediator
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
02-Sep-2024
Referred to Mediator
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
12-Jul-2024
Referred to Mediator
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
13-Jun-2024
Issue NBW
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
18-May-2024
Issue Summons
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-Apr-2024
To record plea of the accused
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
27-Jan-2024
Appearance of Accused
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
05-Dec-2023
Appearance of Accused
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
14-Nov-2023
Appearance of Accused
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
09-Oct-2023
repeat NBW
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
08-Aug-2023
repeat NBW
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
29-Jul-2023
Adjourned
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-Jun-2023
Issue NBW
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
18-May-2023
Issue Summons
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2023
Appearance of Accused
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
21-Dec-2022
Appearance of Accused
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
14-Nov-2022
Appearance of Accused
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
25-Aug-2022
Appearance of Accused
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
30-Jun-2022
Appearance of Accused
Special Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
06-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Mar-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 31/2022
Summary of Case 31/2022 The Special Judicial First Class Magistrate acquitted all five accused (Sathar, Ahammed Parhan, Shamsseer, Muhammed Shafi, and Muhammed Abdul Sameer) of charges under IPC Sections 447, 341, and 323 r/w 34 for alleged criminal trespass, wrongful restraint, and assault on January 24, 2021. The key witness—the de facto complainant—turned hostile and stated she could not identify her assailants, while the other witness also failed to provide incriminating evidence. Finding insufficient prosecution evidence, the court acquitted all accused and set them at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts