Ismayil N K vs Seenath — 495/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: KLKK150004252024

e-Filing Number

13-12-2024

Filing Number

514/2024

Filing Date

16-Dec-2024

Registration No

495/2024

Registration Date

16-Dec-2024

Court

Spl. Addl Sessions Court, Marad Cases, Kozhikode

Judge

1-Additional District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ismayil N K

    Adv. NIPUN KUMAR N

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Seenath

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 495/2024 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed Ismayil N K's appeal, upholding his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque. The court confirmed his sentence of simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 4,60,550/-, with 3 months additional imprisonment in default of fine payment. Key Reasoning: Ismayil borrowed Rs. 3,00,000/- from Seenath and issued a cheque dated 6.12.2018, which was dishonoured for insufficient funds. Despite statutory notice, he failed to pay within 15 days. The court found statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act favoured the complainant and remained unrebutted, as the appellant's defence (that the cheque was for purchasing a jeep and misused) lacked credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  4. 12-May-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  5. 06-May-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  6. 02-May-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  7. 25-Apr-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  8. 17-Apr-2026

    For Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  9. 13-Apr-2026

    For Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  10. 25-Mar-2026

    Await Lcr

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  11. 16-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  12. 02-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  13. 17-Jan-2026

    Judge on leave / duty

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  14. 20-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  15. 24-Nov-2025

    Await Lcr

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  16. 07-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  17. 27-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  18. 18-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  19. 26-Sep-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  20. 25-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  21. 14-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  22. 02-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  23. 20-Jun-2025

    Call on

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  24. 14-May-2025

    Call on

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  25. 25-Apr-2025

    For return of summons

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  26. 04-Apr-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  27. 14-Mar-2025

    Call on

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  28. 22-Feb-2025

    For Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  29. 20-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 16-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 495/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 495/2024 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed Ismayil N K's appeal, upholding his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque. The court confirmed his sentence of simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 4,60,550/-, with 3 months additional imprisonment in default of fine payment. Key Reasoning: Ismayil borrowed Rs. 3,00,000/- from Seenath and issued a cheque dated 6.12.2018, which was dishonoured for insufficient funds. Despite statutory notice, he failed to pay within 15 days. The court found statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act favoured the complainant and remained unrebutted, as the appellant's defence (that the cheque was for purchasing a jeep and misused) lacked credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case