Ismayil N K vs Seenath — 495/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: KLKK150004252024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

13-12-2024

Filing Number

514/2024

Filing Date

16-12-2024

Registration No

495/2024

Registration Date

16-12-2024

Court

Spl. Addl Sessions Court, Marad Cases, Kozhikode

Judge

1-Additional District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415

Petitioner(s)

Ismayil N K

Adv. NIPUN KUMAR N

Respondent(s)

Seenath

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Additional District and Sessions Judge

13-05-2026

Disposed

12-05-2026

Order/Judgement

06-05-2026

Order/ Judgement

02-05-2026

Order/Judgement

25-04-2026

Order/ Judgement

Final Orders / Judgements

13-05-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 495/2024 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed Ismayil N K's appeal, upholding his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque. The court confirmed his sentence of simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 4,60,550/-, with 3 months additional imprisonment in default of fine payment. Key Reasoning: Ismayil borrowed Rs. 3,00,000/- from Seenath and issued a cheque dated 6.12.2018, which was dishonoured for insufficient funds. Despite statutory notice, he failed to pay within 15 days. The court found statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act favoured the complainant and remained unrebutted, as the appellant's defence (that the cheque was for purchasing a jeep and misused) lacked credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 495/2024 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed Ismayil N K's appeal, upholding his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque. The court confirmed his sentence of simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 4,60,550/-, with 3 months additional imprisonment in default of fine payment. Key Reasoning: Ismayil borrowed Rs. 3,00,000/- from Seenath and issued a cheque dated 6.12.2018, which was dishonoured for insufficient funds. Despite statutory notice, he failed to pay within 15 days. The court found statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act favoured the complainant and remained unrebutted, as the appellant's defence (that the cheque was for purchasing a jeep and misused) lacked credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Spl. Addl Sessions Court, Marad Cases, Kozhikode All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case