Ismayil N K vs Seenath — 495/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.
Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KLKK150004252024
e-Filing Number
13-12-2024
Filing Number
514/2024
Filing Date
16-12-2024
Registration No
495/2024
Registration Date
16-12-2024
Court
Spl. Addl Sessions Court, Marad Cases, Kozhikode
Judge
1-Additional District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ismayil N K
Adv. NIPUN KUMAR N
Respondent(s)
Seenath
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/Judgement
Order/ Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-05-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 06-05-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 02-05-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 25-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 495/2024 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed Ismayil N K's appeal, upholding his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque. The court confirmed his sentence of simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 4,60,550/-, with 3 months additional imprisonment in default of fine payment. Key Reasoning: Ismayil borrowed Rs. 3,00,000/- from Seenath and issued a cheque dated 6.12.2018, which was dishonoured for insufficient funds. Despite statutory notice, he failed to pay within 15 days. The court found statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act favoured the complainant and remained unrebutted, as the appellant's defence (that the cheque was for purchasing a jeep and misused) lacked credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 495/2024 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed Ismayil N K's appeal, upholding his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque. The court confirmed his sentence of simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 4,60,550/-, with 3 months additional imprisonment in default of fine payment. Key Reasoning: Ismayil borrowed Rs. 3,00,000/- from Seenath and issued a cheque dated 6.12.2018, which was dishonoured for insufficient funds. Despite statutory notice, he failed to pay within 15 days. The court found statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act favoured the complainant and remained unrebutted, as the appellant's defence (that the cheque was for purchasing a jeep and misused) lacked credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts