Muhammed Hussain vs M/s Ideal Publications Trust Rep by Advertisement and Legal Manager Mohammed Hisham A P — 266/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(3)(a). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd May 2026.
Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KLKK150001372025
Filing Number
266/2025
Filing Date
25-07-2025
Registration No
266/2025
Registration Date
25-07-2025
Court
Spl. Addl Sessions Court, Marad Cases, Kozhikode
Judge
1-Additional District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
23rd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Muhammed Hussain
Adv. PRAJEESH A J
Respondent(s)
M/s Ideal Publications Trust Rep by Advertisement and Legal Manager Mohammed Hisham A P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-05-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 14-05-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 28-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 22-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The appellate court dismissed Muhammed Hussain's appeal, upholding his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of Rs. 3,00,000 to Ideal Publications Trust for advertising services. The court rejected his defense that the cheque was his employer's security deposit, finding it lacked credible evidence and contradicted the documented commercial transaction and statutory presumptions favoring the cheque holder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The appellate court dismissed Muhammed Hussain's appeal, upholding his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of Rs. 3,00,000 to Ideal Publications Trust for advertising services. The court rejected his defense that the cheque was his employer's security deposit, finding it lacked credible evidence and contradicted the documented commercial transaction and statutory presumptions favoring the cheque holder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts