SHO, Perambra Police Station vs A1 Mujeeb Rahman Advocate - IRSHAD.P.P, IRSHAD.P.P, IRSHAD.P.PFathima Najla T K, — 687/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 364,354B,354A(2),354,376(2)(j),302,394,118,201,392. Status: Verify and report. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLKK010036322024
Filing Number
3425/2024
Filing Date
13-Jun-2024
Registration No
687/2024
Registration Date
09-Jul-2024
Court
District Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kozhikode
Judge
2-Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 07-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
240
Police Station
Perambra PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHO (Station House Officer), Perambra Police Station
Adv. P P
Respondent(s)
-
1.A1 Mujeeb Rahman Advocate - IRSHAD.P.P, IRSHAD.P.P, IRSHAD.P.PFathima Najla T K,
-
2.A2 Raveena
Adv. IRSHAD.P.P,KRISHNAJA E Adv AKBAR SAHADATH OP
Case History
-
22-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
Verify and report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
29-May-2026
Call on
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Apr-2026
Call on
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Await report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Call on
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Order Summary Bail Petition Dismissed. Mujeeb Rahman's bail application under Section 483 BNSS was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kozhikode. The accused is charged with kidnapping, rape, murder, and robbery of a woman in March 2024. Despite arguments that procedural irregularities in his arrest rendered it illegal, the court found all legal formalities substantially complied with and held that minor procedural lapses do not warrant bail absent demonstrable prejudice. The court emphasized the grave nature of allegations, prima facie evidence of involvement, the accused's history of 52 prior cases, and risk of absconding, affirming the High Court's earlier dismissal of his bail plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Feb-2026
For production of accused
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Await report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Dec-2025
Await report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Await report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Oct-2025
Await report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Aug-2025
Await report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
31-Jul-2025
Await report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Jul-2025
Await report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Jun-2025
Call on
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
17-May-2025
Await report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Apr-2025
Await report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Mar-2025
Await report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2025
Await report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Feb-2025
For production of accused
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2025
For reports
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Dec-2024
For reports
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Dec-2024
Remand Extended
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Nov-2024
Remand Extended
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Nov-2024
Remand Extended
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Oct-2024
Remand Extended
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Oct-2024
Call on
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Sep-2024
Call on
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Aug-2024
Call on
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Aug-2024
Call on
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Jul-2024
Hearing on Charge
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Jul-2024
Issue production warrant
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 687/2024
Court Order Summary Bail Petition Dismissed. Mujeeb Rahman's bail application under Section 483 BNSS was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kozhikode. The accused is charged with kidnapping, rape, murder, and robbery of a woman in March 2024. Despite arguments that procedural irregularities in his arrest rendered it illegal, the court found all legal formalities substantially complied with and held that minor procedural lapses do not warrant bail absent demonstrable prejudice. The court emphasized the grave nature of allegations, prima facie evidence of involvement, the accused's history of 52 prior cases, and risk of absconding, affirming the High Court's earlier dismissal of his bail plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts