Dhanya Sudheesh vs Prabhakaran — 129/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 31st March 2026.
Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KLKK010021042025
e-Filing Number
15-04-2025
Filing Number
1175/2025
Filing Date
19-04-2025
Registration No
129/2025
Registration Date
19-04-2025
Court
District Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kozhikode
Judge
3-IInd Additional District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhanya Sudheesh
Adv. Satheesan Vazhayil
Respondent(s)
Prabhakaran
Hearing History
Judge: 3-IInd Additional District And Sessions Judge
Disposed
For Steps
For Arguments
Appellant prays
Appellant prays
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | For Steps |
| 16-03-2026 | For Arguments |
| 03-02-2026 | Appellant prays |
| 03-01-2026 | Appellant prays |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Dhanya Sudheesh v. Prabhakaran (129/2025) The Sessions Court dismissed Dhanya Sudheesh's appeal against her conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court upheld her conviction for issuing a cheque for ₹10,00,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds and incomplete signature, after she failed to repay a loan despite a legal demand notice. The court found that Sudheesh's defenses—claiming she didn't issue the cheque and that her husband fabricated the case—lacked evidentiary support and failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act that she executed the cheque to settle a legally enforceable debt. The original sentence of imprisonment and ₹14,35,000 fine was confirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Dhanya Sudheesh v. Prabhakaran (129/2025) The Sessions Court dismissed Dhanya Sudheesh's appeal against her conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court upheld her conviction for issuing a cheque for ₹10,00,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds and incomplete signature, after she failed to repay a loan despite a legal demand notice. The court found that Sudheesh's defenses—claiming she didn't issue the cheque and that her husband fabricated the case—lacked evidentiary support and failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act that she executed the cheque to settle a legally enforceable debt. The original sentence of imprisonment and ₹14,35,000 fine was confirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts