Shantilal Jadavji patalia vs State of kerala rep by its secretary to govenment department of forest and wildlife — 4/2020
Case under Kerala Forest Act Section 10. Status: Defendant/Respondent Evidence. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
OA(EFL) - ORIGINAL APPLICATION (EFL)
CNR: KLKK010016992020
Filing Number
790/2020
Filing Date
17-Jun-2020
Registration No
4/2020
Registration Date
27-Jul-2020
Court
District Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kozhikode
Judge
2-Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 07-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shantilal Jadavji patalia
Adv. Razal Rahman
-
2.Jinesh Santhilal Patalia
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of kerala rep by its secretary to govenment department of forest and wildlife
-
2.The Custodian of Ecolpogical Fragile Land( The Pricipal Chief Conservator of Forest)
-
3.Divisional Forest Office South Wayanad Division, Kalpetta
Case History
-
14-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Jun-2026
Further evidence
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
11-May-2026
For Steps
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Apr-2026
Judge on leave / duty
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Issue Summons
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Further evidence
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
for evidence
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
for evidence
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Jan-2026
For Carry Out Amendment
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
For additional written statement
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Dec-2025
For additional written statement
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Dec-2025
Judge on leave / duty
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
For additional written statement
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Oct-2025
For additional written statement
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Oct-2025
For additional written statement
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Tribunal for EFL Cases (Ecologically Fragile Land) at Kozhikode allowed two amendment applications (IA 01/2025 in OA 04/2020 and IA 03/2025 in OA 05/2020) filed by petitioners seeking to reduce and correct the extent of scheduled properties in accordance with an Advocate Commissioner's report. The court permitted the applicants to confine their claims to only the cultivated portions identified by the Commissioner and Botanist, rejecting the respondents' (State of Kerala) opposition based on challenging the report's accuracy. The court held that the amendment was necessary to determine the real controversy and would not prejudice the respondents, who retain the right to file additional counter statements and challenge the report during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Sep-2025
For Carry Out Amendment
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Aug-2025
Call with IA
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Aug-2025
Call with IA
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Jul-2025
Call with IA
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
Call with IA
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Jun-2025
Call with IA
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jun-2025
Call with IA
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
15-May-2025
for evidence
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
08-May-2025
For Steps
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
02-May-2025
Verify and report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Mar-2025
For Steps
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Feb-2025
Take steps last chance
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Feb-2025
For Steps
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2025
For Steps
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Jan-2025
Call with IA
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Dec-2024
Call with IA
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Dec-2024
Call with IA
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Nov-2024
Call with IA
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Nov-2024
Call with IA
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Oct-2024
Call with IA
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Oct-2024
Call with IA
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Sep-2024
Call with IA
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Aug-2024
Call with IA
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Jul-2024
Call with IA
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Jun-2024
Objection to Cr
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Jun-2024
Objection to Cr
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
13-May-2024
Objection to Cr
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2024
Objection to Cr
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2024
Objection to Cr
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Nov-2023
Objection to Cr
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Aug-2023
Objection
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Aug-2023
Call on
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Jul-2023
For commission report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jun-2023
Issue Summons
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Jun-2023
For commission report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
18-May-2023
For commission report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Apr-2023
For commission report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2023
For commission report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Jan-2023
Call on
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2022
Issue notice
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Nov-2022
For commission report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Sep-2022
For commission report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Aug-2022
Call on
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Jul-2022
For commission report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Jun-2022
For commission report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Apr-2022
For commission report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2022
Call on
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Feb-2022
Call on
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2022
For commission report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Dec-2021
For commission report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Nov-2021
For commission report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Sep-2021
Call on
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Sep-2021
Call on
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Jul-2021
Call on
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Jul-2021
For commission report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
24-May-2021
For commission report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2021
For commission report
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2021
Call with IA
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Feb-2021
For Hearing
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Jan-2021
For Counter
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Dec-2020
For Steps
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Nov-2020
For Counter
Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Oct-2020
Call on
IIInd Additional District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Sep-2020
Call on
IIInd Additional District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Jul-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jun-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2020
Summary: The Tribunal for EFL Cases (Ecologically Fragile Land) at Kozhikode allowed two amendment applications (IA 01/2025 in OA 04/2020 and IA 03/2025 in OA 05/2020) filed by petitioners seeking to reduce and correct the extent of scheduled properties in accordance with an Advocate Commissioner's report. The court permitted the applicants to confine their claims to only the cultivated portions identified by the Commissioner and Botanist, rejecting the respondents' (State of Kerala) opposition based on challenging the report's accuracy. The court held that the amendment was necessary to determine the real controversy and would not prejudice the respondents, who retain the right to file additional counter statements and challenge the report during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts