Muhammed Jasarudeen vs Muhammed Jasim T M — 95/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3)(a). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: KLKK010016672024

e-Filing Number

18-03-2024

Filing Number

2024/2024

Filing Date

19-Mar-2024

Registration No

95/2024

Registration Date

19-Mar-2024

Court

District Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kozhikode

Judge

2-Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Perambra PS

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Muhammed Jasarudeen

    Adv. MOHAMMAD ABDUL AZEEZ K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Muhammed Jasim T M

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The appellate court confirmed the conviction of Muhammed Jasarudeen under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque for Rs. 7,00,000/-. The court found that the accused's inconsistent defense coupled with his admission of signature on the cheque and an acknowledged receipt created a statutory presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act that the cheque was issued to discharge a debt, which he failed to rebut with credible evidence. The sentence of imprisonment till rising of court and fine of Rs. 10,66,100/- (including 9% interest) with 6 months default imprisonment was upheld as reasonable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Call on

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Appellant prays

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  10. 12-Dec-2025

    Call on

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  11. 11-Nov-2025

    Issue notice

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  12. 04-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  13. 25-Aug-2025

    For Hearing

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  14. 25-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  15. 29-May-2025

    Await Records

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  16. 07-Apr-2025

    Await Records

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  17. 25-Feb-2025

    For L C R

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  18. 12-Feb-2025

    Call with Mp

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  19. 29-Jan-2025

    Call with Mp

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  20. 30-Dec-2024

    Call with Mp

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  21. 16-Dec-2024

    Call with Mp

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  22. 16-Nov-2024

    Call with Mp

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  23. 19-Oct-2024

    Call with Mp

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  24. 11-Sep-2024

    Call with Mp

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  25. 08-Aug-2024

    Call with Mp

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  26. 11-Jul-2024

    Call with Mp

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  27. 12-Jun-2024

    Call with Mp

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  28. 12-Apr-2024

    Call with Mp

    Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge

  29. 20-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 19-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 95/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The appellate court confirmed the conviction of Muhammed Jasarudeen under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque for Rs. 7,00,000/-. The court found that the accused's inconsistent defense coupled with his admission of signature on the cheque and an acknowledged receipt created a statutory presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act that the cheque was issued to discharge a debt, which he failed to rebut with credible evidence. The sentence of imprisonment till rising of court and fine of Rs. 10,66,100/- (including 9% interest) with 6 months default imprisonment was upheld as reasonable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case