S.H.O. Karimannoor. P.S. vs Kunjumon John Advocate - CHERIAN A — 3000362/2022
Case under Ipc \ Section 363, 376.2.2.n, 370.4, 370A1, 67B,84, 6 1, 5.1. Status: Issue Summons. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLID300000712022
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3000362/2022
Filing Date
03-07-2024
Registration No
3000362/2022
Registration Date
03-07-2024
Court
Fast Track Special Court Idukki
Judge
1-Judge FTSC Idukki
FIR Details
FIR Number
352
Police Station
Karimannoor Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.H.O. Karimannoor. P.S.
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Kunjumon John Advocate - CHERIAN A
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge FTSC Idukki
Issue Summons
Issue Summons
Further evidence
Issue Bailable Warrant
For Examination of Witness
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Issue Summons | |
| 23-03-2026 | Issue Summons | |
| 18-03-2026 | Further evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue Bailable Warrant | |
| 03-03-2026 | For Examination of Witness |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Fast Track Special Court in Idukki dismissed a petition filed by the accused (Kunjumon) under Section 311 Cr.P.C. seeking recall and re-examination of witnesses (PW2, PW3, and PW20) in Sessions Case No. 362/2022. The court found insufficient grounds for recall, citing the Supreme Court principle that there is no inflexible rule to routinely permit witness recall merely due to inadequate cross-examination attributable to counsel changes, as this would have serious consequences on criminal justice administration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Fast Track Special Court in Idukki dismissed a petition filed by the accused (Kunjumon) under Section 311 Cr.P.C. seeking recall and re-examination of witnesses (PW2, PW3, and PW20) in Sessions Case No. 362/2022. The court found insufficient grounds for recall, citing the Supreme Court principle that there is no inflexible rule to routinely permit witness recall merely due to inadequate cross-examination attributable to counsel changes, as this would have serious consequences on criminal justice administration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts