SHO Kanjar vs ASHKAR S/ONAUSHAD Advocate - ROBIN MANUAL — 300473/2022

Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Section 12r/w11(ii)(iv). Status: For Examination of Witness. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLID300000552022

For Examination of Witness

Next Hearing

08th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

300473/2022

Filing Date

13-09-2023

Registration No

300473/2022

Registration Date

13-09-2023

Court

Fast Track Special Court Idukki

Judge

1-Judge FTSC Idukki

FIR Details

FIR Number

908

Police Station

Kanjar Police Station

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Section 12r/w11(ii)(iv)
Crl.MP/10/2025 Classification : Section ASHKAR S/ONAUSHAD
Crl.MP/97/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section ASHKAR S/ONAUSHADSHO Kanjar
Crl.MP/98/2025 Classification : Petition Section SHO Kanjar
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Adjournment Application Section SHO Kanjar

Petitioner(s)

SHO (Station House Officer) Kanjar

Respondent(s)

ASHKAR S/ONAUSHAD Advocate - ROBIN MANUAL

SREERAJ S/O SREENIVASAN

Adv. ROBIN MANUAL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judge FTSC Idukki

23-04-2026

For Examination of Witness

21-04-2026

For Examination of Witness

25-03-2026

Issue Summons

23-03-2026

Call on

10-03-2026

Issue Summons

Interim Orders

25-10-2025
Order

Summary The petition filed by the 1st accused seeking to recall and re-examine PW1 (the victim) has been dismissed. The court found that the victim had already been cross-examined in detail by the accused's counsel and no specific grounds justifying re-examination were provided. Additionally, Section 33(5) of the POCSO Act mandates that victims not be called repeatedly to testify. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition filed by the 1st accused seeking to recall and re-examine PW1 (the victim) has been dismissed. The court found that the victim had already been cross-examined in detail by the accused's counsel and no specific grounds justifying re-examination were provided. Additionally, Section 33(5) of the POCSO Act mandates that victims not be called repeatedly to testify. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Fast Track Special Court Idukki All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case