V.TJayesh vs Kunjumon Advocate - JOHNEY P C — 43/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section section 26 order 7 rule 1 and 3. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLID290000602025
Filing Number
2900079/2025
Filing Date
10-Jul-2025
Registration No
43/2025
Registration Date
10-Jul-2025
Court
Munsiff Court, Adimaly
Judge
1-Munsiff Adimaly
Last updated 30-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.V.TJayesh
Adv. Sunny M Thenalil
-
2.V.T.Rajesh
Adv. Sunny M Thenalil
-
3.V.V.Neethu
Adv. Sunny M Thenalil
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kunjumon Advocate - JOHNEY P C
-
2.Saly Thomas
Adv. JOHNEY P C
Case History
-
21-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
31-Mar-2026
Written Statement
Munsiff Adimaly
-
10-Mar-2026
Refer to Adalath
Munsiff Adimaly
-
09-Dec-2025
No sitting notified
Munsiff Adimaly
-
23-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary Petition Allowed - Temporary Injunction Granted The Court of the Munsiff at Adimaly granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendants from trespassing, taking forcible possession, or causing any disturbance to the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of their cardamom estate properties (14.30+ hectares) until disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case based on registered title documents and evidence of an attempted trespass on July 2, 2025, with balance of convenience favoring property protection. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff Adimaly
-
18-Sep-2025
Orders in IA
Munsiff Adimaly
-
16-Sep-2025
For hearing on IA
Munsiff Adimaly
-
15-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff Adimaly
-
08-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff Adimaly
-
11-Aug-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff Adimaly
-
10-Jul-2025
OrderView PDF
-
10-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 43/2025
Summary Petition Allowed - Temporary Injunction Granted The Court of the Munsiff at Adimaly granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendants from trespassing, taking forcible possession, or causing any disturbance to the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of their cardamom estate properties (14.30+ hectares) until disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case based on registered title documents and evidence of an attempted trespass on July 2, 2025, with balance of convenience favoring property protection. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts