V.TJayesh vs Kunjumon Advocate - JOHNEY P C — 43/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section section 26 order 7 rule 1 and 3. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLID290000602025

Written Statement

Next Hearing

21st July 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2900079/2025

Filing Date

10-07-2025

Registration No

43/2025

Registration Date

10-07-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Adimaly

Judge

1-Munsiff Adimaly

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section section 26 order 7 rule 1 and 3
IA/1/2025 Classification : Section V.TJayeshKunjumon
IA/2/2025 Classification : Section V.TJayeshKunjumon
IA/3/2025 Classification : Section V.TJayeshKunjumon

Petitioner(s)

V.TJayesh

Adv. Sunny M Thenalil

V.T.Rajesh

Adv. Sunny M Thenalil

V.V.Neethu

Adv. Sunny M Thenalil

Respondent(s)

Kunjumon Advocate - JOHNEY P C

Saly Thomas

Adv. JOHNEY P C

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff Adimaly

31-03-2026

Written Statement

10-03-2026

Refer to Adalath

09-12-2025

No sitting notified

23-09-2025

Written Statement

18-09-2025

Orders in IA

Interim Orders

10-07-2025
Order
23-09-2025
Order

Summary Petition Allowed - Temporary Injunction Granted The Court of the Munsiff at Adimaly granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendants from trespassing, taking forcible possession, or causing any disturbance to the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of their cardamom estate properties (14.30+ hectares) until disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case based on registered title documents and evidence of an attempted trespass on July 2, 2025, with balance of convenience favoring property protection. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Petition Allowed - Temporary Injunction Granted The Court of the Munsiff at Adimaly granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendants from trespassing, taking forcible possession, or causing any disturbance to the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of their cardamom estate properties (14.30+ hectares) until disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case based on registered title documents and evidence of an attempted trespass on July 2, 2025, with balance of convenience favoring property protection. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Adimaly All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case