V.TJayesh vs Kunjumon Advocate - JOHNEY P C — 43/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section section 26 order 7 rule 1 and 3. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLID290000602025
Next Hearing
21st July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2900079/2025
Filing Date
10-07-2025
Registration No
43/2025
Registration Date
10-07-2025
Court
Munsiff Court, Adimaly
Judge
1-Munsiff Adimaly
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
V.TJayesh
Adv. Sunny M Thenalil
V.T.Rajesh
Adv. Sunny M Thenalil
V.V.Neethu
Adv. Sunny M Thenalil
Respondent(s)
Kunjumon Advocate - JOHNEY P C
Saly Thomas
Adv. JOHNEY P C
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff Adimaly
Written Statement
Refer to Adalath
No sitting notified
Written Statement
Orders in IA
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 10-03-2026 | Refer to Adalath | |
| 09-12-2025 | No sitting notified | |
| 23-09-2025 | Written Statement | |
| 18-09-2025 | Orders in IA |
Interim Orders
Summary Petition Allowed - Temporary Injunction Granted The Court of the Munsiff at Adimaly granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendants from trespassing, taking forcible possession, or causing any disturbance to the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of their cardamom estate properties (14.30+ hectares) until disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case based on registered title documents and evidence of an attempted trespass on July 2, 2025, with balance of convenience favoring property protection. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Petition Allowed - Temporary Injunction Granted The Court of the Munsiff at Adimaly granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendants from trespassing, taking forcible possession, or causing any disturbance to the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of their cardamom estate properties (14.30+ hectares) until disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case based on registered title documents and evidence of an attempted trespass on July 2, 2025, with balance of convenience favoring property protection. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts