George Joseph @Varkey vs Manoj Jose — 1400174/2024

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section SECTION37ANDORDERXX1RULE10AND11. Status: For commission report. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.

For commission report Next hearing 21-May-2026 this date has passed

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLID140007382024

e-Filing Number

21-12-2024

Filing Number

1400891/2024

Filing Date

21-Dec-2024

Registration No

1400174/2024

Registration Date

24-Dec-2024

Court

Munsiff Court Kattappana

Judge

1-Munsiff Kattappana

Last updated 30-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section SECTION37ANDORDERXX1RULE10AND11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.George Joseph @Varkey

    Adv. K.G SHAJIMON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manoj Jose

  2. 2.Manesh Jose

Case History

  1. 21-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Interim Order

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    For commission report

    Munsiff Kattappana

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    For reports

    Munsiff Kattappana

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Stayed

    Munsiff Kattappana

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Call on

    Munsiff Kattappana

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    For reports

    Munsiff Kattappana

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Petition Dismissed: The Munsiff Court of Kattappana dismissed the petition filed by judgment debtors Manoj Jose and Maneesh Jose seeking to stay execution of a compromise decree. The court held that parties bound by a valid compromise decree cannot challenge its terms by citing alleged errors in revenue records, as decisions by revenue authorities are not binding on civil courts and do not affect compromises already recorded in court decrees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Take Steps

    Munsiff Kattappana

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    For Orders

    Munsiff Kattappana

  11. 21-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kattappana

  12. 20-Jan-2026

    For Orders

    Munsiff Kattappana

  13. 14-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kattappana

  14. 12-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kattappana

  15. 05-Jan-2026

    Call on

    Munsiff Kattappana

  16. 03-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kattappana

  17. 01-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kattappana

  18. 19-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kattappana

  19. 18-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kattappana

  20. 11-Dec-2025

    For further hearing

    Munsiff Kattappana

  21. 08-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kattappana

  22. 15-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kattappana

  23. 13-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kattappana

  24. 11-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kattappana

  25. 07-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kattappana

  26. 21-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Kattappana

  27. 25-Sep-2025

    For Objection

    Munsiff Kattappana

  28. 08-Sep-2025

    For Objection

    Munsiff Kattappana

  29. 23-Aug-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff Kattappana

  30. 25-Jul-2025

    For Return Of Notice

    Munsiff Kattappana

  31. 08-Jul-2025

    Take Steps

    Munsiff Kattappana

  32. 04-Jun-2025

    Return of notice

    Munsiff Kattappana

  33. 07-Apr-2025

    Return of notice

    Munsiff Kattappana

  34. 20-Mar-2025

    Take Steps

    Munsiff Kattappana

  35. 06-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 21-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1400174/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Petition Dismissed: The Munsiff Court of Kattappana dismissed the petition filed by judgment debtors Manoj Jose and Maneesh Jose seeking to stay execution of a compromise decree. The court held that parties bound by a valid compromise decree cannot challenge its terms by citing alleged errors in revenue records, as decisions by revenue authorities are not binding on civil courts and do not affect compromises already recorded in court decrees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case