Lissy @ Alekutty vs Varghese Scaria Advocate - Jiby Sebastian — 1400529/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Listed to Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLID140006822022

Filing Number

1400834/2022

Filing Date

03-Dec-2022

Registration No

1400529/2022

Registration Date

03-Dec-2022

Court

Munsiff Court Kattappana

Judge

1-Munsiff Kattappana

Last updated 30-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lissy @ Alekutty

    Adv. Shiji Joseph

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Varghese Scaria Advocate - Jiby Sebastian

  2. 2.Thankachan

    Adv. Jiby Sebastian

  3. 3.Thomas

    Adv. Jiby Sebastian

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Listed to

    Munsiff Kattappana

  3. 07-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Kattappana

  4. 07-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Kattappana

  5. 09-Dec-2025

    For additional written statement

    Munsiff Kattappana

  6. 14-Nov-2025

    For additional written statement

    Munsiff Kattappana

  7. 04-Nov-2025

    Final OrderView PDF

    Summary The petition filed under Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code by the plaintiff (Lissy) seeking to amend the plaint description of property boundaries and road length was allowed. The court held that the amendments regarding the eastern and western boundaries of the B schedule property and the corrected road length of 75 meters (instead of 200 meters) are necessary for determining the real questions in controversy, and any incorrect pleading will only affect the plaintiff's case without prejudicing the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 04-Nov-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff Kattappana

  9. 03-Nov-2025

    For Orders

    Munsiff Kattappana

  10. 30-Oct-2025

    For Orders

    Munsiff Kattappana

  11. 18-Oct-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff Kattappana

  12. 10-Oct-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff Kattappana

  13. 22-Sep-2025

    For Objection

    Munsiff Kattappana

  14. 25-Aug-2025

    For Objection

    Munsiff Kattappana

  15. 19-Aug-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff Kattappana

  16. 10-Jul-2025

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff Kattappana

  17. 07-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff Kattappana

  18. 02-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff Kattappana

  19. 04-Apr-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff Kattappana

  20. 25-Mar-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff Kattappana

  21. 03-Mar-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff Kattappana

  22. 04-Feb-2025

    For Further Evidence

    Munsiff Kattappana

  23. 30-Jan-2025

    Further evidence

    Munsiff Kattappana

  24. 30-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Munsiff Kattappana

  25. 10-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Munsiff Kattappana

  26. 06-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Munsiff Kattappana

  27. 18-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Munsiff Kattappana

  28. 26-Jun-2024

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff Kattappana

  29. 23-May-2024

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff Kattappana

  30. 11-Mar-2024

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff Kattappana

  31. 30-Jan-2024

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff Kattappana

  32. 15-Dec-2023

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff Kattappana

  33. 07-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Kattappana

  34. 19-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Kattappana

  35. 20-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Kattappana

  36. 05-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Kattappana

  37. 08-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Kattappana

  38. 07-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Kattappana

  39. 05-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 03-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1400529/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition filed under Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code by the plaintiff (Lissy) seeking to amend the plaint description of property boundaries and road length was allowed. The court held that the amendments regarding the eastern and western boundaries of the B schedule property and the corrected road length of 75 meters (instead of 200 meters) are necessary for determining the real questions in controversy, and any incorrect pleading will only affect the plaintiff's case without prejudicing the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case