Lissy @ Alekutty vs Varghese Scaria Advocate - Jiby Sebastian — 1400529/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLID140006822022
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1400834/2022
Filing Date
03-12-2022
Registration No
1400529/2022
Registration Date
03-12-2022
Court
Munsiff Court Kattappana
Judge
1-Munsiff Kattappana
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lissy @ Alekutty
Adv. Shiji Joseph
Respondent(s)
Varghese Scaria Advocate - Jiby Sebastian
Thankachan
Adv. Jiby Sebastian
Thomas
Adv. Jiby Sebastian
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff Kattappana
Listed to
Written Statement
Written Statement
For additional written statement
For additional written statement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Listed to | |
| 07-02-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 07-01-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 09-12-2025 | For additional written statement | |
| 14-11-2025 | For additional written statement |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition filed under Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code by the plaintiff (Lissy) seeking to amend the plaint description of property boundaries and road length was allowed. The court held that the amendments regarding the eastern and western boundaries of the B schedule property and the corrected road length of 75 meters (instead of 200 meters) are necessary for determining the real questions in controversy, and any incorrect pleading will only affect the plaintiff's case without prejudicing the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition filed under Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code by the plaintiff (Lissy) seeking to amend the plaint description of property boundaries and road length was allowed. The court held that the amendments regarding the eastern and western boundaries of the B schedule property and the corrected road length of 75 meters (instead of 200 meters) are necessary for determining the real questions in controversy, and any incorrect pleading will only affect the plaintiff's case without prejudicing the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts