The Federal Bank Ltd vs Jacob T Oommen Advocate - Jomon K Chacko — 1300028/2014
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 151. Status: Call on. Next hearing: 28th May 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLID130000992014
Next Hearing
28th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
28/2014
Filing Date
11-04-2014
Registration No
1300028/2014
Registration Date
11-04-2014
Court
Sub Court Kattappana
Judge
1-Sub Judge Kattappana
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Federal Bank Ltd
Adv. Tom Thomas
Respondent(s)
Jacob T Oommen Advocate - Jomon K Chacko
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge Kattappana
Call on
Call on
Call on
Call on
Call on
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Call on | |
| 31-03-2026 | Call on | |
| 10-03-2026 | Call on | |
| 17-02-2026 | Call on | |
| 21-01-2026 | Call on |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition Allowed. The Sub Judge held that the 26.50 cents of property cannot be sold by the bank (decree holder) in execution proceeding EP 28/2014, as it was previously attached in 2002 in favor of the petitioner and subsequently sold to him in 2010 to satisfy an earlier decree. The court ruled that the bank's subsequent mortgage on the property (dated 2008) is void under Section 64 of the CPC, as any transfer after attachment contradicts the attachment rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition Allowed. The Sub Judge held that the 26.50 cents of property cannot be sold by the bank (decree holder) in execution proceeding EP 28/2014, as it was previously attached in 2002 in favor of the petitioner and subsequently sold to him in 2010 to satisfy an earlier decree. The court ruled that the bank's subsequent mortgage on the property (dated 2008) is void under Section 64 of the CPC, as any transfer after attachment contradicts the attachment rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts