KSEB vs Viswa Hindhu Parishad Advocate - Benny Joseph — 1300119/2003
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26 order 7. Status: Call on. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLID130000712017
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1300268/2017
Filing Date
22-08-2003
Registration No
1300119/2003
Registration Date
22-08-2003
Court
Sub Court Kattappana
Judge
1-Sub Judge Kattappana
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KSEB
Adv. Sunny Cheriyan, Stantly Augusthy
KSEB
Adv. Stantly Augusthy
Respondent(s)
Viswa Hindhu Parishad Advocate - Benny Joseph
M N Mohanan
Adv. Benny Joseph
Rajesh Sukumaran
Adv. K J James
Manoj Viswambaran
Adv. K J James
K N Rajendran
Adv. Benny Joseph
T K Raju
Adv. Benny Joseph
B Sukumaran
Adv. No Vakkalath
P N Vinod
Adv. Benny Joseph
Thevan Mannan
Adv. K J James
Govinda Sasthri
Adv. No Vakkalath
Satheeshkumar
Adv. No Vakkalath
T K Raju
Adv. No Vakkalath
TheDeity Sridharma Sastha Temple,
Adv. Tom Thomas
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge Kattappana
Call on
Produce Stay Order
No sitting notified
Stayed
Stayed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Call on | |
| 10-03-2026 | Produce Stay Order | |
| 12-02-2026 | No sitting notified | |
| 04-02-2026 | Stayed | |
| 29-11-2025 | Stayed |
Interim Orders
Summary The Sub Judge of Kattappana allowed KSEB's application to amend the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 CPC to update the plaintiff's name following its incorporation as a public company and to provide detailed property description based on the commission report. The amendment was permitted on payment of Rs. 3,000 to the defendants as costs, with the amendment to be carried out within 3 days, and defendants given the right to file additional written statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sub Judge of Kattappana allowed KSEB's application to amend the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 CPC to update the plaintiff's name following its incorporation as a public company and to provide detailed property description based on the commission report. The amendment was permitted on payment of Rs. 3,000 to the defendants as costs, with the amendment to be carried out within 3 days, and defendants given the right to file additional written statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts