State of Kerala (Police) vs Anil George Advocate - CS Georgekutty — 100533/2021
Case under Abkari Act Section U/Ss.8(2)and(1)and55(g). Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLID010018042021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100533/2021
Filing Date
29-10-2021
Registration No
100533/2021
Registration Date
29-10-2021
Court
District and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thodupuzha
Judge
4-III Addl. District Judge/I Addl MACT,Thodupuzha
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
901
Police Station
Muttom Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
Anil George Advocate - CS Georgekutty
Jose P.K.
Vishnu
Baburaj
Hearing History
Judge: 4-III Addl. District Judge/I Addl MACT,Thodupuzha
Disposed
Adjourned for Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
For hearing under section 232 CRPC
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-03-2026 | Adjourned for Judgement | |
| 18-02-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 12-02-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 06-02-2026 | For hearing under section 232 CRPC |
Final Orders / Judgements
Judgement
Interim Orders
Summary: The Sessions Court at Thodupuzha allowed the petition of the accused (Anil George) to obtain a no objection certificate for passport application, despite pending criminal charges under the Abkari Act. The court reasoned that mere pendency of a criminal case should not be the sole ground for denial, especially since the petitioner is on bail and stated no intention to leave India. However, the court imposed conditions requiring the petitioner to file an affidavit undertaking not to leave India and to appear on all court posting dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Sessions Court at Thodupuzha allowed the petition of the accused (Anil George) to obtain a no objection certificate for passport application, despite pending criminal charges under the Abkari Act. The court reasoned that mere pendency of a criminal case should not be the sole ground for denial, especially since the petitioner is on bail and stated no intention to leave India. However, the court imposed conditions requiring the petitioner to file an affidavit undertaking not to leave India and to appear on all court posting dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
District and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thodupuzha All courts →Explore other courts