State of Kerala Police vs Prasad Advocate - V.A.PRADEEP KUMAR — 1533/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 28th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLER850000292025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1184/2025
Filing Date
13-11-2025
Registration No
1533/2025
Registration Date
14-11-2025
Court
Fast Track Special Court North Paravur
Judge
1-Spl.Judge, FTSC, N.Paravur
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
203
Police Station
Vadakkekara Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Prasad Advocate - V.A.PRADEEP KUMAR
Sanitha
Adv. V.A.PRADEEP KUMAR,NIVEA K G
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Spl.Judge, FTSC, N.Paravur
Disposed
Examination of the Accused U/S 351 BNSS
Issue Summons
Call with MP
Issue Bailable Warrant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 351 BNSS | |
| 11-03-2026 | Issue Summons | |
| 10-03-2026 | Call with MP | |
| 09-03-2026 | Issue Bailable Warrant |
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Fast Track Special Court at North Paravur dismissed discharge petitions filed by both accused under Section 262 of BNSS in a Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (PoCSO) Act case. The court found sufficient ground to proceed against the accused based on the survivor's statement describing a forcible hug and kiss on New Year's Eve 2024. The court rejected arguments citing family disputes, contradictions in statements, and alleged false implication, holding that credibility assessments and corroboration matters are trial issues, not discharge stage matters, and proceeded to frame charges against both accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Fast Track Special Court at North Paravur dismissed discharge petitions filed by both accused under Section 262 of BNSS in a Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (PoCSO) Act case. The court found sufficient ground to proceed against the accused based on the survivor's statement describing a forcible hug and kiss on New Year's Eve 2024. The court rejected arguments citing family disputes, contradictions in statements, and alleged false implication, holding that credibility assessments and corroboration matters are trial issues, not discharge stage matters, and proceeded to frame charges against both accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts