Najeeb K K vs Badarudeen Advocate - Sidharth S Nair — 244/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII Rule 1. Status: Orders in IA. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER760007672025

Orders in IA

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

574/2025

Filing Date

10-10-2025

Registration No

244/2025

Registration Date

10-10-2025

Court

Munsiff court Kothamangalam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section Order VII Rule 1
IA/1/2025 Classification : Injunction Application Section Najeeb K K
IA/2/2025 Classification : Commission Application Section Najeeb K K
IA/3/2025 Classification : Petition To Accept Photocopy Section Najeeb K K
IA/4/2025 Classification : Today Moving Petition Section BadarudeenNajeeb K K
IA/5/2025 Classification : Commission Application Section BadarudeenNajeeb K K

Petitioner(s)

Najeeb K K

Adv. ANI A R

Pareeth

Adv. ANI A R,BABU KUMAR V C Jayalal M

Respondent(s)

Badarudeen Advocate - Sidharth S Nair

Nisha Badarudeen

Adv. Sidharth S Nair,GIGI PETER

Shajitha

Adv. Sidharth S Nair,GIGI PETER

Shifas

Adv. Sidharth S Nair,GIGI PETER

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff

07-03-2026

Orders in IA

16-02-2026

Orders in IA

17-01-2026

Orders in IA

03-01-2026

Written Statement

20-12-2025

Call with IA

Interim Orders

10-10-2025
Judgement

Case Summary Ad-interim temporary injunction GRANTED. The Court of Munsiff, Kothamangalam granted an ad-interim temporary injunction restraining respondents from obstructing petitioners' use of the C schedule way, trespassing into A and B schedule properties, and destroying boundaries, pending further orders. Petitioner must comply with CPC Order 39 Rules 3(a) and (b). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Ad-interim temporary injunction GRANTED. The Court of Munsiff, Kothamangalam granted an ad-interim temporary injunction restraining respondents from obstructing petitioners' use of the C schedule way, trespassing into A and B schedule properties, and destroying boundaries, pending further orders. Petitioner must comply with CPC Order 39 Rules 3(a) and (b). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff court Kothamangalam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case