Najeeb K K vs Badarudeen Advocate - Sidharth S Nair — 244/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII Rule 1. Status: Orders in IA. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Orders in IA Next hearing 27-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER760007672025

Filing Number

574/2025

Filing Date

10-Oct-2025

Registration No

244/2025

Registration Date

10-Oct-2025

Court

Munsiff court Kothamangalam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Najeeb K K

    Adv. ANI A R

  2. 2.Pareeth

    Adv. ANI A R,BABU KUMAR V C Jayalal M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Badarudeen Advocate - Sidharth S Nair

  2. 2.Nisha Badarudeen

    Adv. Sidharth S Nair,GIGI PETER

  3. 3.Shajitha

    Adv. Sidharth S Nair,GIGI PETER

  4. 4.Shifas

    Adv. Sidharth S Nair,GIGI PETER

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff

  3. 16-Feb-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff

  4. 17-Jan-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff

  5. 03-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  6. 20-Dec-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff

  7. 10-Oct-2025

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary Ad-interim temporary injunction GRANTED. The Court of Munsiff, Kothamangalam granted an ad-interim temporary injunction restraining respondents from obstructing petitioners' use of the C schedule way, trespassing into A and B schedule properties, and destroying boundaries, pending further orders. Petitioner must comply with CPC Order 39 Rules 3(a) and (b). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 10-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 244/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Ad-interim temporary injunction GRANTED. The Court of Munsiff, Kothamangalam granted an ad-interim temporary injunction restraining respondents from obstructing petitioners' use of the C schedule way, trespassing into A and B schedule properties, and destroying boundaries, pending further orders. Petitioner must comply with CPC Order 39 Rules 3(a) and (b). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case