The Kadavoor Service Co OpBank Ltd No E 1882 vs Chikku Sunil Advocate - ADV. JIJO — 300192/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order21. Status: With connected case. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

With connected case Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLER760003582024

e-Filing Number

04-08-2024

Filing Number

300389/2024

Filing Date

06-Aug-2024

Registration No

300192/2024

Registration Date

06-Aug-2024

Court

Munsiff court Kothamangalam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section order21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Kadavoor Service Co OpBank Ltd No E 1882

    Adv. Sidharth S Nair,Gigi Peter

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chikku Sunil Advocate - ADV. JIJO

  2. 2.Sunil Issac

    Adv. ADV. JIJO

  3. 3.Sophy Sunil

    Adv. ADV. JIJO

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  7. 24-Jan-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  8. 03-Jan-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  9. 19-Dec-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  10. 10-Dec-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  11. 20-Nov-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  12. 27-Oct-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  13. 25-Oct-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  14. 10-Oct-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  15. 20-Sep-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  16. 11-Sep-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  17. 18-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The petition filed by judgment debtors to set aside an ex-parte order dated 15.11.2024 has been dismissed as not maintainable. The court held that the 30-day limitation period under CPC Order XXI Rule 106(3) applied to the petition, and since it was filed on 30.07.2025—well after the 30-day deadline—it was barred by limitation. The court rejected the debtors' argument that the executing court lacked jurisdiction to set them ex-parte, holding that Order XXI Rules 23 and 105 statutorily empower the court to do so upon non-appearance. However, the judgment debtors retain the right to participate in further execution proceedings upon receiving proper notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 18-Aug-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  19. 16-Aug-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff

  20. 05-Aug-2025

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff

  21. 31-Jul-2025

    For Orders in Ea

    Munsiff

  22. 27-Jun-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  23. 26-Jun-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  24. 04-Apr-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff

  25. 14-Mar-2025

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    Munsiff

  26. 27-Feb-2025

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    Munsiff

  27. 15-Nov-2024

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    Munsiff

  28. 08-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 06-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300192/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by judgment debtors to set aside an ex-parte order dated 15.11.2024 has been dismissed as not maintainable. The court held that the 30-day limitation period under CPC Order XXI Rule 106(3) applied to the petition, and since it was filed on 30.07.2025—well after the 30-day deadline—it was barred by limitation. The court rejected the debtors' argument that the executing court lacked jurisdiction to set them ex-parte, holding that Order XXI Rules 23 and 105 statutorily empower the court to do so upon non-appearance. However, the judgment debtors retain the right to participate in further execution proceedings upon receiving proper notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case