The Kadavoor Service Co OpBank Ltd No E 1882 vs Chikku Sunil Advocate - ADV. JIJO — 300191/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order21. Status: With connected case. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLER760003572024
e-Filing Number
04-08-2024
Filing Number
300388/2024
Filing Date
06-Aug-2024
Registration No
300191/2024
Registration Date
06-Aug-2024
Court
Munsiff court Kothamangalam
Judge
1-Munsiff
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The Kadavoor Service Co OpBank Ltd No E 1882
Adv. Sidharth S Nair, Gigi Peter
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chikku Sunil Advocate - ADV. JIJO
-
2.Sunil Issac
Adv. ADV. JIJO
-
3.Sophy Sunil
Adv. ADV. JIJO
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Mar-2026
With connected case
Munsiff
-
18-Mar-2026
With connected case
Munsiff
-
13-Mar-2026
With connected case
Munsiff
-
07-Mar-2026
With connected case
Munsiff
-
27-Feb-2026
With connected case
Munsiff
-
24-Jan-2026
With connected case
Munsiff
-
03-Jan-2026
With connected case
Munsiff
-
19-Dec-2025
With connected case
Munsiff
-
10-Dec-2025
With connected case
Munsiff
-
20-Nov-2025
With connected case
Munsiff
-
27-Oct-2025
With connected case
Munsiff
-
25-Oct-2025
With connected case
Munsiff
-
10-Oct-2025
With connected case
Munsiff
-
20-Sep-2025
With connected case
Munsiff
-
11-Sep-2025
With connected case
Munsiff
-
18-Aug-2025
OrderView PDF
Case Summary Petition Dismissed – The Munsiff Court of Kothamangalam dismissed the judgment debtors' petition seeking to set aside an ex-parte order dated 15.11.2024, finding it barred by limitation. The petition was filed on 30.07.2025, exceeding the 30-day limitation period under Order XXI Rule 106(3) of CPC. The court rejected the debtors' argument that the executing court lacked jurisdiction to pass ex-parte orders, holding that Order XXI Rules 23 and 105 expressly empower such orders upon non-appearance. However, the debtors retain the right to participate in future execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Aug-2025
With connected case
Munsiff
-
16-Aug-2025
Orders in IA
Munsiff
-
05-Aug-2025
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
31-Jul-2025
Orders in IA
Munsiff
-
27-Jun-2025
With connected case
Munsiff
-
26-Jun-2025
With connected case
Munsiff
-
04-Apr-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
14-Mar-2025
For production of documents/Affidavit
Munsiff
-
27-Feb-2025
For production of documents/Affidavit
Munsiff
-
15-Nov-2024
For production of documents/Affidavit
Munsiff
-
08-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 300191/2024
Case Summary Petition Dismissed – The Munsiff Court of Kothamangalam dismissed the judgment debtors' petition seeking to set aside an ex-parte order dated 15.11.2024, finding it barred by limitation. The petition was filed on 30.07.2025, exceeding the 30-day limitation period under Order XXI Rule 106(3) of CPC. The court rejected the debtors' argument that the executing court lacked jurisdiction to pass ex-parte orders, holding that Order XXI Rules 23 and 105 expressly empower such orders upon non-appearance. However, the debtors retain the right to participate in future execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts