The Kadavoor Service Co OpBank Ltd No E 1882 vs Chikku Sunil Advocate - ADV. JIJO — 300191/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order21. Status: With connected case. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

With connected case Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLER760003572024

e-Filing Number

04-08-2024

Filing Number

300388/2024

Filing Date

06-Aug-2024

Registration No

300191/2024

Registration Date

06-Aug-2024

Court

Munsiff court Kothamangalam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section order21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Kadavoor Service Co OpBank Ltd No E 1882

    Adv. Sidharth S Nair, Gigi Peter

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chikku Sunil Advocate - ADV. JIJO

  2. 2.Sunil Issac

    Adv. ADV. JIJO

  3. 3.Sophy Sunil

    Adv. ADV. JIJO

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  7. 24-Jan-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  8. 03-Jan-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  9. 19-Dec-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  10. 10-Dec-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  11. 20-Nov-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  12. 27-Oct-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  13. 25-Oct-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  14. 10-Oct-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  15. 20-Sep-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  16. 11-Sep-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  17. 18-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Petition Dismissed – The Munsiff Court of Kothamangalam dismissed the judgment debtors' petition seeking to set aside an ex-parte order dated 15.11.2024, finding it barred by limitation. The petition was filed on 30.07.2025, exceeding the 30-day limitation period under Order XXI Rule 106(3) of CPC. The court rejected the debtors' argument that the executing court lacked jurisdiction to pass ex-parte orders, holding that Order XXI Rules 23 and 105 expressly empower such orders upon non-appearance. However, the debtors retain the right to participate in future execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 18-Aug-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  19. 16-Aug-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff

  20. 05-Aug-2025

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff

  21. 31-Jul-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff

  22. 27-Jun-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  23. 26-Jun-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  24. 04-Apr-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff

  25. 14-Mar-2025

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    Munsiff

  26. 27-Feb-2025

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    Munsiff

  27. 15-Nov-2024

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    Munsiff

  28. 08-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 06-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300191/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Petition Dismissed – The Munsiff Court of Kothamangalam dismissed the judgment debtors' petition seeking to set aside an ex-parte order dated 15.11.2024, finding it barred by limitation. The petition was filed on 30.07.2025, exceeding the 30-day limitation period under Order XXI Rule 106(3) of CPC. The court rejected the debtors' argument that the executing court lacked jurisdiction to pass ex-parte orders, holding that Order XXI Rules 23 and 105 expressly empower such orders upon non-appearance. However, the debtors retain the right to participate in future execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case