The Kadavoor Service Co OpBank Ltd No E 1882 vs Chikku Sunil Advocate - ADV. JIJO, ELDHOSE VARGHESE — 300189/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order21. Status: With connected case. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLER760003542024

With connected case

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

e-Filing Number

04-08-2024

Filing Number

300385/2024

Filing Date

06-08-2024

Registration No

300189/2024

Registration Date

06-08-2024

Court

Munsiff court Kothamangalam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section order21
EA/2/2025 Classification : Section Chikku SunilThe Kadavoor Service Co OpBank Ltd No E 1882

Petitioner(s)

The Kadavoor Service Co OpBank Ltd No E 1882

Adv. Sidharth S Nair

Respondent(s)

Chikku Sunil Advocate - ADV. JIJO, ELDHOSE VARGHESE

Sunil Issac

Adv. ADV. JIJO,ELDHOSE VARGHESE

Sophy Sunil

Adv. ADV. JIJO,ELDHOSE VARGHESE

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff

23-03-2026

With connected case

18-03-2026

With connected case

13-03-2026

With connected case

07-03-2026

With connected case

27-02-2026

With connected case

Interim Orders

18-08-2025
Order

SUMMARY The petition filed by judgment debtors to set aside an ex-parte order dated 15.11.2024 is dismissed as not maintainable. The court held that the 30-day limitation period under Order XXI Rule 106(3) of CPC had expired, as the petition was filed only on 30.07.2025, well beyond the stipulated timeframe. However, the dismissal does not prevent the petitioners from participating in future execution proceedings upon receipt of proper notices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The petition filed by judgment debtors to set aside an ex-parte order dated 15.11.2024 is dismissed as not maintainable. The court held that the 30-day limitation period under Order XXI Rule 106(3) of CPC had expired, as the petition was filed only on 30.07.2025, well beyond the stipulated timeframe. However, the dismissal does not prevent the petitioners from participating in future execution proceedings upon receipt of proper notices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff court Kothamangalam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case