The Kadavoor Service Co OpBank Ltd No E 1882 vs Chikku Sunil Advocate - ADV. JIJO, ELDHOSE VARGHESE — 300189/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order21. Status: With connected case. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

With connected case Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLER760003542024

e-Filing Number

04-08-2024

Filing Number

300385/2024

Filing Date

06-Aug-2024

Registration No

300189/2024

Registration Date

06-Aug-2024

Court

Munsiff court Kothamangalam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section order21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Kadavoor Service Co OpBank Ltd No E 1882

    Adv. Sidharth S Nair

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chikku Sunil Advocate - ADV. JIJO, ELDHOSE VARGHESE

  2. 2.Sunil Issac

    Adv. ADV. JIJO,ELDHOSE VARGHESE

  3. 3.Sophy Sunil

    Adv. ADV. JIJO,ELDHOSE VARGHESE

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  7. 24-Jan-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  8. 03-Jan-2026

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  9. 19-Dec-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  10. 10-Dec-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  11. 20-Nov-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  12. 27-Oct-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  13. 25-Oct-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  14. 10-Oct-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  15. 20-Sep-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  16. 11-Sep-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  17. 18-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY The petition filed by judgment debtors to set aside an ex-parte order dated 15.11.2024 is dismissed as not maintainable. The court held that the 30-day limitation period under Order XXI Rule 106(3) of CPC had expired, as the petition was filed only on 30.07.2025, well beyond the stipulated timeframe. However, the dismissal does not prevent the petitioners from participating in future execution proceedings upon receipt of proper notices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 18-Aug-2025

    With connected case

    Munsiff

  19. 16-Aug-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff

  20. 05-Aug-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff

  21. 31-Jul-2025

    For Orders in Ea

    Munsiff

  22. 27-Jun-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff

  23. 26-Jun-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff

  24. 04-Apr-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff

  25. 14-Mar-2025

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    Munsiff

  26. 27-Feb-2025

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    Munsiff

  27. 15-Nov-2024

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    Munsiff

  28. 08-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 06-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300189/2024

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The petition filed by judgment debtors to set aside an ex-parte order dated 15.11.2024 is dismissed as not maintainable. The court held that the 30-day limitation period under Order XXI Rule 106(3) of CPC had expired, as the petition was filed only on 30.07.2025, well beyond the stipulated timeframe. However, the dismissal does not prevent the petitioners from participating in future execution proceedings upon receipt of proper notices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case