The Kadavoor Service Co OpBank Ltd No E 1882 vs Chikku Sunil Advocate - ADV. JIJO — 300188/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order21. Status: Call on. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Call on Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLER760003532024

e-Filing Number

04-08-2024

Filing Number

300384/2024

Filing Date

06-Aug-2024

Registration No

300188/2024

Registration Date

06-Aug-2024

Court

Munsiff court Kothamangalam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section order21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Kadavoor Service Co OpBank Ltd No E 1882

    Adv. Sidharth S Nair

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chikku Sunil Advocate - ADV. JIJO

  2. 2.Sunil Issac

    Adv. ADV. JIJO

  3. 3.Sophy Sunil

    Adv. ADV. JIJO

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Munsiff

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Munsiff

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Call with IA

    Munsiff

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Call with IA

    Munsiff

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    For Steps

    Munsiff

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    For Steps

    Munsiff

  9. 24-Jan-2026

    Bound over

    Munsiff

  10. 03-Jan-2026

    Return of summons

    Munsiff

  11. 19-Dec-2025

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    Munsiff

  12. 10-Dec-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff

  13. 20-Nov-2025

    Issue notice

    Munsiff

  14. 27-Oct-2025

    For reports

    Munsiff

  15. 25-Oct-2025

    For affidavit.

    Munsiff

  16. 10-Oct-2025

    For affidavit.

    Munsiff

  17. 20-Sep-2025

    For return of summons

    Munsiff

  18. 11-Sep-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff

  19. 18-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

  20. 18-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The petition filed by judgment debtors Chikku Sunil, Sunil Issac, and Sophy Sunil to review the court's order dated 27.06.2025 was allowed. The court found that the sale proclamation for Rs. 5,00,000 failed to comply with Order XXI Rule 66(2)(c) of CPC, 1908, constituting a manifest error on the face of the record. Accordingly, the order dated 27.06.2025 was recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  21. 18-Aug-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff

  22. 16-Aug-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff

  23. 05-Aug-2025

    For Orders in Ea

    Munsiff

  24. 31-Jul-2025

    For Orders in Ea

    Munsiff

  25. 30-Jul-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff

  26. 29-Jul-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff

  27. 27-Jun-2025

    Sale

    Munsiff

  28. 26-Jun-2025

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    Munsiff

  29. 04-Apr-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  30. 14-Mar-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff

  31. 27-Feb-2025

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    Munsiff

  32. 15-Nov-2024

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    Munsiff

  33. 08-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 06-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300188/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by judgment debtors Chikku Sunil, Sunil Issac, and Sophy Sunil to review the court's order dated 27.06.2025 was allowed. The court found that the sale proclamation for Rs. 5,00,000 failed to comply with Order XXI Rule 66(2)(c) of CPC, 1908, constituting a manifest error on the face of the record. Accordingly, the order dated 27.06.2025 was recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case