Seniar Hassainar vs INTUC Party — 300063/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OrderVIIRule1. Status: Report on mediation. Next hearing: 26th June 2026.

Report on mediation Next hearing 26-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLER760001792025

e-Filing Number

07-03-2025

Filing Number

300189/2025

Filing Date

10-Mar-2025

Registration No

300063/2025

Registration Date

10-Mar-2025

Court

Munsiff court Kothamangalam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section OrderVIIRule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Seniar Hassainar

    Adv. Rohit S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INTUC Party

  2. 2.Muhammed

    Adv. Adv. Sidharth S Nair

  3. 3.Basheer

    Adv. Adv. Sidharth S Nair

  4. 4.Joy Chitnappilli

    Adv. Adv. Sidharth S Nair

  5. 5.Baby

    Adv. Adv. Sidharth S Nair

  6. 6.Shindo Varghese

    Adv. Adv. Sidharth S Nair

Case History

  1. 26-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff

  4. 26-Nov-2025

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff

  5. 19-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  6. 19-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  7. 31-May-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The petition for temporary injunction filed by Seniar Hassainar against the INTUC party and five others has been dismissed. The Civil Judge held that since the petitioner himself admitted that the respondents had already trespassed and taken possession of part of the disputed property (plaint B schedule property), a temporary injunction—which can only prevent future wrongs—cannot be granted. The court reasoned that the injury had already occurred prior to the suit, making the discretionary relief inappropriate. Each party shall bear its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 10-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300063/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition for temporary injunction filed by Seniar Hassainar against the INTUC party and five others has been dismissed. The Civil Judge held that since the petitioner himself admitted that the respondents had already trespassed and taken possession of part of the disputed property (plaint B schedule property), a temporary injunction—which can only prevent future wrongs—cannot be granted. The court reasoned that the injury had already occurred prior to the suit, making the discretionary relief inappropriate. Each party shall bear its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case