Jyothi vs Divakaran Advocate - V.M. Biju Kumar. — 300017/2021
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Order 21. Status: Call with IA. Next hearing: 23rd May 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLER760001542021
Filing Number
300149/2021
Filing Date
04-Oct-2021
Registration No
300017/2021
Registration Date
04-Oct-2021
Court
Munsiff court Kothamangalam
Judge
1-Munsiff
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jyothi
Adv. Martindas V. James
Respondent(s)
-
1.Divakaran Advocate - V.M. Biju Kumar.
-
2.Omana
Adv. V. M. Biju Kumar
Case History
-
23-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Mar-2026
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
21-Mar-2026
For production of documents/Affidavit
Munsiff
-
07-Mar-2026
For production of documents/Affidavit
Munsiff
-
16-Feb-2026
For production of documents/Affidavit
Munsiff
-
30-Jan-2026
Call on
Munsiff
-
19-Dec-2025
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: The petition filed by judgment debtors (father-in-law and mother-in-law) seeking to direct the decree holder to deposit Rs. 14,50,000 toward a bank loan they had mortgaged their property for has been dismissed. The court found that the Lok Adalat compromise award only obligated the decree holder to clear the mortgage on one specific property (with Oonnukal Bank), which she already did, but contained no provision requiring her to pay off the judgment debtors' separate loan with Kavalangadu Service Cooperative Bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Dec-2025
For affidavit.
Munsiff
-
21-Nov-2025
For production of documents/Affidavit
Munsiff
-
20-Nov-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
24-Oct-2025
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
27-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
-
27-Sep-2025
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
27-Aug-2025
For Orders in Ea
Munsiff
-
18-Jul-2025
Orders in IA
Munsiff
-
22-Mar-2025
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
17-Mar-2025
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
01-Mar-2025
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
22-Feb-2025
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
14-Feb-2025
Return of notice
Munsiff
-
23-Jan-2025
For Steps
Munsiff
-
03-Jan-2025
Orders in IA
Munsiff
-
29-Nov-2024
Orders in IA
Munsiff
-
19-Oct-2024
Orders in IA
Munsiff
-
10-Oct-2024
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
13-Sep-2024
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
19-Aug-2024
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
24-Jul-2024
for evidence
Munsiff
-
12-Apr-2024
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
29-Feb-2024
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
09-Feb-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
16-Dec-2023
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
04-Nov-2023
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
06-Oct-2023
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
13-Jul-2023
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
13-Apr-2023
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
30-Mar-2023
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
03-Mar-2023
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
28-Jan-2023
Call on
Munsiff
-
08-Dec-2022
Call on
Munsiff
-
17-Nov-2022
Orders in IA
Munsiff
-
29-Oct-2022
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
29-Sep-2022
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
25-Aug-2022
For Counter
Munsiff
-
29-Jul-2022
For Counter
Munsiff
-
16-Jun-2022
For Counter
Munsiff
-
26-May-2022
For Counter
Munsiff
-
04-Feb-2022
Objection
Munsiff
-
12-Nov-2021
Objection
Munsiff
-
04-Oct-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Oct-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 300017/2021
Case Summary: The petition filed by judgment debtors (father-in-law and mother-in-law) seeking to direct the decree holder to deposit Rs. 14,50,000 toward a bank loan they had mortgaged their property for has been dismissed. The court found that the Lok Adalat compromise award only obligated the decree holder to clear the mortgage on one specific property (with Oonnukal Bank), which she already did, but contained no provision requiring her to pay off the judgment debtors' separate loan with Kavalangadu Service Cooperative Bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts