Misriya KH vs Mohammad Aslam PY Advocate - AADIL NAZARUDEEN, ABDUL JALEEL K A, ABDUL JALEEL K AAADIL NAZARUDEEN,, ABDUL JALEEL K AAADIL NAZARUDEEN,AADIL NAZARUDEEN, — 20/2025
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 23(2),12. Status: For Payment. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE
CNR: KLER740002042025
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
20/2025
Filing Date
02-05-2025
Registration No
20/2025
Registration Date
02-05-2025
Court
Gram Nyayalaya,Vadavucode
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Misriya KH
Adv. Pooja M Nair
Respondent(s)
Mohammad Aslam PY Advocate - AADIL NAZARUDEEN, ABDUL JALEEL K A, ABDUL JALEEL K AAADIL NAZARUDEEN,, ABDUL JALEEL K AAADIL NAZARUDEEN,AADIL NAZARUDEEN,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari
For Payment
For balance statement
for evidence.
Adjourned
for evidence.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | For Payment |
| 02-02-2026 | For balance statement |
| 21-01-2026 | for evidence. |
| 05-12-2025 | Adjourned |
| 04-11-2025 | for evidence. |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition filed under Section 23(2) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partially granted. The court found the petitioner (wife) a victim of domestic violence by her husband and in-laws, and issued interim protection orders. The court directed the respondent (husband) to pay ₹5,500 monthly for maintenance of the minor daughter, and ordered police assistance for implementing the protection order. The petitioner's claim for full maintenance was partially rejected at this interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition filed under Section 23(2) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partially granted. The court found the petitioner (wife) a victim of domestic violence by her husband and in-laws, and issued interim protection orders. The court directed the respondent (husband) to pay ₹5,500 monthly for maintenance of the minor daughter, and ordered police assistance for implementing the protection order. The petitioner's claim for full maintenance was partially rejected at this interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts