State of Kerala (Police) vs Joy Advocate - MADHU — 201/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2), 296(b), 351(2), 115(2), 118(2), 121(1). Status: To summon witness. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
Cr.No(ERN-PS-Puthenvelikkara) - Puthenvelikkara, PS
CNR: KLER720011602025
e-Filing Number
05-05-2025
Filing Number
355/2025
Filing Date
28-Jul-2025
Registration No
201/2025
Registration Date
13-Aug-2025
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court 3,North Paravur
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Last updated 30-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
355
Police Station
Puthenvelikkara Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Joy Advocate - MADHU
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Mar-2026
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2026
Await Records
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
18-Dec-2025
For framing of charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
30-Oct-2025
Appearance of Accused
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
23-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Aug-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary: The petition filed by Puthenvelikkara Police Station to cancel the bail of accused Joy (granted on 13.05.2025) was dismissed. The court held that mere registration of a subsequent crime (Crime 444/2025) against the accused cannot automatically result in bail cancellation, relying on Kerala High Court precedents. The court found no compelling grounds to cancel bail, noting the accused had not misused liberty, the final report in the original case was filed before the subsequent crime registration, and the second offense could not be treated as overwhelming enough to impede fair trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 201/2025
Summary: The petition filed by Puthenvelikkara Police Station to cancel the bail of accused Joy (granted on 13.05.2025) was dismissed. The court held that mere registration of a subsequent crime (Crime 444/2025) against the accused cannot automatically result in bail cancellation, relying on Kerala High Court precedents. The court found no compelling grounds to cancel bail, noting the accused had not misused liberty, the final report in the original case was filed before the subsequent crime registration, and the second offense could not be treated as overwhelming enough to impede fair trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts