Venugopal vs Muralidhara Prabhu Advocate - SURAJ KRISHNA — 1280/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 210, 223 and 175(3). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.MP - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETN.

CNR: KLER700009322025

Filing Number

1280/2025

Filing Date

30-Jul-2025

Registration No

1280/2025

Registration Date

11-Aug-2025

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court ,Mattancherry

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 210, 223 and 175(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Venugopal

    Adv. LEEMA ROSY D

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Muralidhara Prabhu Advocate - SURAJ KRISHNA

  2. 2.Jollly

  3. 3.Jovett

  4. 4.Rajkumar Pai

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    For hearing in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    For hearing in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Mattancherry Judicial First Class Magistrate dismissed an accused's petition seeking a hearing under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS), holding that accused persons have no right to be heard during the preliminary inquiry stage before a complaint is forwarded for FIR registration. The court distinguished Section 175(3) from Section 223 BNSS, noting that the right to hearing applies only when cognizance is taken, not during the earlier investigative inquiry phase; notice to the accused is required only if they are public servants accused of acts during official duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    For hearing in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  10. 16-Jan-2026

    Oders in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  11. 13-Jan-2026

    Oders in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  12. 09-Jan-2026

    Oders in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  13. 07-Jan-2026

    For hearing in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  14. 05-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  15. 01-Nov-2025

    For hearing in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  16. 10-Oct-2025

    For hearing in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  17. 03-Oct-2025

    For Objection and hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  18. 17-Sep-2025

    For hearing in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  19. 10-Sep-2025

    For reports

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  20. 27-Aug-2025

    Call for report.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  21. 20-Aug-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  22. 19-Aug-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  23. 14-Aug-2025

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  24. 13-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 30-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1280/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Mattancherry Judicial First Class Magistrate dismissed an accused's petition seeking a hearing under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS), holding that accused persons have no right to be heard during the preliminary inquiry stage before a complaint is forwarded for FIR registration. The court distinguished Section 175(3) from Section 223 BNSS, noting that the right to hearing applies only when cognizance is taken, not during the earlier investigative inquiry phase; notice to the accused is required only if they are public servants accused of acts during official duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case