Shyama vs Krishnan Unni — 43/2025
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 23, 12. Status: Objection. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE
CNR: KLER640020672025
Filing Number
967/2025
Filing Date
22-Oct-2025
Registration No
43/2025
Registration Date
22-Oct-2025
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Tripunithura
Judge
1-Judicail First Class Magistrate, Thripunithura
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shyama
Adv. Sebastine V A, Sebastine V A
Respondent(s)
-
1.Krishnan Unni
-
2.Balakrishnan
Case History
-
16-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Objection
Judicail First Class Magistrate, Thripunithura
-
09-Feb-2026
For objecting and hearing Cmp
Judicail First Class Magistrate, Thripunithura
-
09-Jan-2026
For objecting and hearing Cmp
Judicail First Class Magistrate, Thripunithura
-
28-Nov-2025
For appearence of Complainant
Judicail First Class Magistrate, Thripunithura
-
25-Oct-2025
Appearance of Petitioner
Judicail First Class Magistrate, Thripunithura
-
22-Oct-2025
OrderView PDF
SUMMARY: The petition filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act was allowed. The court found a prima facie case of domestic violence and issued an ad-interim order restraining the respondents (husband Krishnanunni and relative Balakrishnan) from committing any form of domestic violence against the petitioner (Shyama). The order was directed to be communicated to the police and Women Protection Officer for necessary action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 43/2025
SUMMARY: The petition filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act was allowed. The court found a prima facie case of domestic violence and issued an ad-interim order restraining the respondents (husband Krishnanunni and relative Balakrishnan) from committing any form of domestic violence against the petitioner (Shyama). The order was directed to be communicated to the police and Women Protection Officer for necessary action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts