State of Kerala (Police) vs ABDUL BASHEER S/O MUHAMMED KUNJU — 100591/2018
Case under Ipc \ Section 419,468,471,420,120(B),34. Status: BW to cws. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLER630010692018
Next Hearing
19th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100591/2018
Filing Date
10-04-2018
Registration No
100591/2018
Registration Date
10-04-2018
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court,Angamaly
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
1079
Police Station
Nedumbassery Police Station
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ABDUL BASHEER S/O MUHAMMED KUNJU
MOIDU S/O RAMSAN
SHERAFUDEEN S/O MUHAMMED
ABDUL WAHAB S/O MUHAMMED KUNJU
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
BW to cws
For reports
For framing charge
Orders in IA
Call with MP
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | BW to cws | |
| 10-03-2026 | For reports | |
| 04-02-2026 | For framing charge | |
| 03-02-2026 | Orders in IA | |
| 20-01-2026 | Call with MP |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition Allowed - Accused Discharged The Court discharged Accused No. 3 (Sharafudeen) from the criminal proceedings in a passport fraud case. The court found that prosecution of the accused, who was a police officer, was barred under Section 197 of the CrPC because no prior sanction from the competent Government authority was obtained. The allegations against him amounted to negligence in official duty rather than active participation, and without the mandatory sanction, the prosecution was vitiated in law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition Allowed - Accused Discharged The Court discharged Accused No. 3 (Sharafudeen) from the criminal proceedings in a passport fraud case. The court found that prosecution of the accused, who was a police officer, was barred under Section 197 of the CrPC because no prior sanction from the competent Government authority was obtained. The allegations against him amounted to negligence in official duty rather than active participation, and without the mandatory sanction, the prosecution was vitiated in law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts