State of Kerala vs Nisar, S/o Hassankutty — 100467/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 419,468,471. Status: 82-83 Steps. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLER630001742018
Filing Number
100467/2018
Filing Date
07-Jul-2018
Registration No
100467/2018
Registration Date
11-Oct-2018
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court,Angamaly
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
409
Police Station
Nedumbassery Police Station
Year
2010
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala
Adv. Adv.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nisar, S/o Hassankutty
Case History
-
25-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
82-83 Steps
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
22-Dec-2025
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
22-Oct-2025
82-83 Steps
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
02-Sep-2025
repeat NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
13-Aug-2025
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
08-Jul-2025
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-May-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
17-Feb-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Jan-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
29-Nov-2024
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
24-Oct-2024
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
02-Sep-2024
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
22-Apr-2024
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
22-Feb-2024
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2024
For framing charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
12-Jan-2024
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: The petition for discharge filed by accused Nisar under Section 239 CrPC has been dismissed. The court found a strong prima facie case against the accused for allegedly obtaining a forged passport (bearing another person's name) with his photograph affixed and using it for travel, thereby committing offences under IPC Sections 419, 468, 471 and The Passports Act Section 12(1)(b)(d). The court held that at the charge stage, the entire prosecution evidence must be believed and discharge is warranted only if no offence is made out, which was not the case here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jan-2024
For framing charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
09-Jan-2024
Call with Mp
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
08-Jan-2024
Call with Mp
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
18-Dec-2023
Call with Mp
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
23-Nov-2023
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
12-Oct-2023
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
13-Sep-2023
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
07-Jun-2023
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
17-May-2023
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
04-Apr-2023
For framing of charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
09-Feb-2023
For framing of charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
05-Dec-2022
82-83 Steps
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
08-Nov-2022
Await warrent
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
25-Oct-2022
Await warrent
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
30-Aug-2022
NBW and notice to Sureties
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
04-Apr-2022
repeat NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
01-Nov-2021
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
19-Jul-2021
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2021
repeat NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
18-Jul-2020
Adjourned
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
12-Feb-2020
Issue Notice to Surety
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
22-Nov-2019
NBW and notice to Sureties
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
06-Sep-2019
repeat NBW
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
05-Jul-2019
Issue Bailable Warrant
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jul-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 100467/2018
Case Summary: The petition for discharge filed by accused Nisar under Section 239 CrPC has been dismissed. The court found a strong prima facie case against the accused for allegedly obtaining a forged passport (bearing another person's name) with his photograph affixed and using it for travel, thereby committing offences under IPC Sections 419, 468, 471 and The Passports Act Section 12(1)(b)(d). The court held that at the charge stage, the entire prosecution evidence must be believed and discharge is warranted only if no offence is made out, which was not the case here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts