State of Kerala vs Nisar, S/o Hassankutty — 100467/2018
Case under Ipc \ Section 419,468,471. Status: 82-83 Steps. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLER630001742018
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100467/2018
Filing Date
07-07-2018
Registration No
100467/2018
Registration Date
11-10-2018
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court,Angamaly
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
409
Police Station
Nedumbassery Police Station
Year
2010
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala
Adv. Adv.
Respondent(s)
Nisar, S/o Hassankutty
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
82-83 Steps
No sitting notified
82-83 Steps
repeat NBW
Call on
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | 82-83 Steps | |
| 22-12-2025 | No sitting notified | |
| 22-10-2025 | 82-83 Steps | |
| 02-09-2025 | repeat NBW | |
| 13-08-2025 | Call on |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The petition for discharge filed by accused Nisar under Section 239 CrPC has been dismissed. The court found a strong prima facie case against the accused for allegedly obtaining a forged passport (bearing another person's name) with his photograph affixed and using it for travel, thereby committing offences under IPC Sections 419, 468, 471 and The Passports Act Section 12(1)(b)(d). The court held that at the charge stage, the entire prosecution evidence must be believed and discharge is warranted only if no offence is made out, which was not the case here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The petition for discharge filed by accused Nisar under Section 239 CrPC has been dismissed. The court found a strong prima facie case against the accused for allegedly obtaining a forged passport (bearing another person's name) with his photograph affixed and using it for travel, thereby committing offences under IPC Sections 419, 468, 471 and The Passports Act Section 12(1)(b)(d). The court held that at the charge stage, the entire prosecution evidence must be believed and discharge is warranted only if no offence is made out, which was not the case here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts