State of Kerala (Police) vs AJITH GANESAN — 100097/2025

Case under Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act Section 3(2)(e). Status: Remand Extended. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLER620003422025

Remand Extended

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

e-Filing Number

02-04-2025

Filing Number

100340/2025

Filing Date

02-04-2025

Registration No

100097/2025

Registration Date

02-04-2025

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court,Chottanikara

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

FIR Details

FIR Number

55

Police Station

Ambalamedu Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

PREVENTION OF DAMAGE TO PUBLIC PROPERTY ACT Section 3(2)(e)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 132,351(1),3(5),296(b)
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section AJITH GANESANState of Kerala (Police)
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Bail Application Section AJITH GANESANState of Kerala (Police)

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala (Police)

Respondent(s)

AJITH GANESAN

AKHIL GANESAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

06-04-2026

Remand Extended

23-03-2026

For appearance of the accused

16-03-2026

for evidence

09-03-2026

for evidence

23-02-2026

for evidence

Interim Orders

27-06-2025
Order

BAIL DENIED The Chottanikkara Judicial Magistrate dismissed the bail application of Ajith Ganeshan and Akhil Ganeshan, who were arrested for destroying police station property, attacking police officials, and intimidating them during custody. The court found that releasing them posed risks of witness intimidation, commission of similar offences, and absconding, given their involvement in multiple other crimes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

09-03-2026

Order

casestatus.in Summary

BAIL DENIED The Chottanikkara Judicial Magistrate dismissed the bail application of Ajith Ganeshan and Akhil Ganeshan, who were arrested for destroying police station property, attacking police officials, and intimidating them during custody. The court found that releasing them posed risks of witness intimidation, commission of similar offences, and absconding, given their involvement in multiple other crimes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court,Chottanikara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case