1. Mariamma @ Shiny vs Jiji P A Advocate - CAROLIN SINDHU VAZ, ADITH, ADITHAkhil M S,, ADITHAkhil M S,Jyothish P K, — 56/2025
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12,23(2). Status: For reports. Next hearing: 30th May 2026.
MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE
CNR: KLER580025152025
Next Hearing
30th May 2026
Filing Number
1484/2025
Filing Date
07-11-2025
Registration No
56/2025
Registration Date
07-11-2025
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court,Piravom
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate Piravom
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
1. Mariamma @ Shiny
Adv. JOSE P T
Ans Jiji
Adv. JOSE P T,GOPAKUMAR K.G. Denny K.T ALTHAF P.A
Respondent(s)
Jiji P A Advocate - CAROLIN SINDHU VAZ, ADITH, ADITHAkhil M S,, ADITHAkhil M S,Jyothish P K,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate Piravom
For reports
Referred to Mediator
For hearing in CMP
For hearing in CMP
Return of notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | For reports |
| 17-01-2026 | Referred to Mediator |
| 11-12-2025 | For hearing in CMP |
| 06-12-2025 | For hearing in CMP |
| 07-11-2025 | Return of notice |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition under Section 23(2) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partly allowed. The court granted interim reliefs restraining the respondent from evicting the petitioners from their residential house and from committing any act of domestic violence against them. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and ordered that other reliefs be considered after hearing both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition under Section 23(2) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partly allowed. The court granted interim reliefs restraining the respondent from evicting the petitioners from their residential house and from committing any act of domestic violence against them. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and ordered that other reliefs be considered after hearing both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts