State of Kerala (Police) vs NAVEEN ANTHRAPPER — 100594/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354 (A) (IV),509. Status: Call on. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLER580002482017

Call on

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

100594/2017

Filing Date

14-11-2017

Registration No

100594/2017

Registration Date

14-11-2017

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court,Piravom

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate Piravom

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 354 (A) (IV),509
Crl.mp/2034/2025 Classification : Discharge Petition Section NAVEEN ANTHRAPPERState of Kerala (Police)

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala (Police)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

NAVEEN ANTHRAPPER

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate Piravom

07-03-2026

Call on

02-02-2026

Appearance of Accused

12-01-2026

Appearance of Accused

05-12-2025

Appearance of Accused

28-11-2025

Oders in CMP

Interim Orders

05-12-2025
Order

Case Summary: The petition filed by accused Naveen Anthraper under Section 239 CrPC seeking discharge in a case involving charges of morphing and publishing obscene photographs on Facebook (IPC Sections 354(A)(iv), 509 and IT Act Sections 67, 67(A)) has been dismissed. The court found prima facie material to proceed with trial, noting that the High Court of Kerala previously upheld the case charges and rejected the accused's petition under Section 482 CrPC, and rejected arguments about lack of physical evidence and FIR delay as mere technicalities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The petition filed by accused Naveen Anthraper under Section 239 CrPC seeking discharge in a case involving charges of morphing and publishing obscene photographs on Facebook (IPC Sections 354(A)(iv), 509 and IT Act Sections 67, 67(A)) has been dismissed. The court found prima facie material to proceed with trial, noting that the High Court of Kerala previously upheld the case charges and rejected the accused's petition under Section 482 CrPC, and rejected arguments about lack of physical evidence and FIR delay as mere technicalities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court,Piravom All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case